Atomic Theory

From Physics Book
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Claimed by: Erin Horbacz (4/17/2022)

Atomic theory states that matter is composed of discrete units, called atoms. The word "atom" comes from the Greek word for uncuttable, atomos, since it was believed that if one cut a substance into smaller and smaller pieces, one would reach a point where the substance could not be cut any further. Scientists later discovered that atoms were indeed able to be broken into subatomic, or elementary, particles including protons, neutrons, and electrons. Furthermore, protons and neutrons can be broken down yet again into smaller, elementary particles called quarks. Atomic theory has evolved greatly over time, but the most recent model stems from quantum mechanics[1].

The Main Idea

A Mathematical Model

Mathematical models of atomic processes have become more thorough and sophisticated as knowledge of atomic properties has grown. The goal of a mathematical model is to express the underlying rules that govern atomic processes in a formula that can then predict and describe the behavior of atoms [2] (such as is seen with the list of Bohr's mathematical models for the atom). Such fundamental formulas are powerful tools for helping scientists understand the interactions within and processes of both microscopic and macroscopic systems. For example, it was Charles-Augustin de Coulomb who first determined the mathematical equation which could accurately describe the electrostatic potential between charged particles that make up an atom:

[math]\displaystyle{ V = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon} \frac{q_1 q_2}{r} }[/math]

Error creating thumbnail: sh: /usr/bin/convert: No such file or directory Error code: 127
Bohr's mathematical model to describe the atom

where V is the electrostatic potential (in volts), [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon} }[/math] is the Coulomb constant, [math]\displaystyle{ q_1 }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ q_2 }[/math] are the charges of two particles, and r is the distance between the two particles.


Additionally, stretching of atomic bonds are known to be affected by force fields around an equilibrium point, and they can be modeled according to the equation:

[math]\displaystyle{ \Delta V(l) = \frac{1}{2} k_l (l - l_0)^2 }[/math]

Where [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta V(l) }[/math] is the change in potential energy at [math]\displaystyle{ l }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ k_1 }[/math] is the spring constant (a proportionality constant), [math]\displaystyle{ l }[/math] is the bond length, and [math]\displaystyle{ l_0 }[/math] is the equilibrium bond length[3].

The use and creation of these formulas is incredibly prominent in simulation modeling. For example, simulations modeling the motion of multiple atoms can use mathematical models such as Leapfrog integration and Verlet integration to update particle positions and velocities respectively[4].


Perhaps the most important aspect of these mathematical models are their ability to take difficult, abstract concepts and represent them in a form that can be manipulated for further research. The creation of models to describe quantum phenomena makes the information more digestible and the concepts somewhat clearer. In fact, it is often the case that a mathematical model describing quantum behavior helps others think about concepts in different ways. In this manner, many discoveries have resulted from generalizing these models to extend beyond their initial boundaries. For example, the wave-particle duality of electrons became known through experiments such as the double-slit experiment and the photoelectric effect. However, it was Louis de Broglie who considered extending the wave nature to all particles, not just electrons. He discovered that all matter has wave properties, and he formulated the de Broglie wavelength[5]:

[math]\displaystyle{ \lambda = \frac{h}{p} }[/math]

This formula tells us the wavelength of any particle with a given momentum. This was a huge breakthrough for atomic theory, and is a great example of the usefulness of atomic mathematical models to represent information and inspire new findings.

A Computational Model

Understanding the composition and structure of atoms is essential to the study of both microscopic and macroscopic systems. Researchers have made use of atomic information to create what are called atomistic models. These models are used to predict and analyze the behavior of complex systems through knowledge of their most fundamental parts. By understanding how atomic structure affects characteristic properties of atoms, scientists are able to create computational models based on simple microscopic characteristics that simulate complex macroscopic systems. In doing so, they aim to better understand the connection between these macroscopic systems and the underlying atomic structures that govern them [6].

Use of simulations in research has broadened both the volume and complexity of analysis that can be done at any one time. The ability to model atoms through simulations has been an integral part of the research done in diverse areas of science, notably materials science. In this field, atomistic models are often used to predict material properties under certain conditions using information about their nucleus and electron density. For example, professor Gumbart of the physics department of Georgia Tech created an atomistic model that simulates the behavior of atoms by modeling the forces between them as a system of springs. A simulation of this type of model can be found here: https://trinket.io/library/trinkets/a6b3149ef8. Another use of atomistic models is to simulate and analyze important processes such as a nuclear chain reaction; an example of such a simulation can be viewed on JavaLab.

Atomistic models use the mathematical models discussed above to computationally represent atomic forces, atomic positions, velocities, and magnetic charges of atoms among other things. The result is an accurate model of quantum processes. Ultimately, the use of such simulations help to understand the collective behavior of atoms and how this behavior affects macroscopic processes (such as deformation and phase change) as well as performance abilities (such as strength of material) [7].


Another simulation of atomic spring model: https://www.myphysicslab.com/springs/molecule3-en.html

History

John Dalton: The Law of Multiple Proportions and Atomic Mass

Dalton's concept of atoms and molecules

Working from the conservation of mass principle, chemist John Dalton determined the law of multiple proportions to understand how different elements combined in compounds. In 1803, he proposed that each element of the periodic table was composed of identical components, atoms, that were unique to each element. He also suggested that these atoms were not created nor destroyed when one element was combined with another. Dalton's empirical, experimentally-based work marked the first scientific theory of the atom.

Dalton proposed a list of atomic weights in 1805. However, Dalton failed to recognize natural tendencies of elements in nature (for example, oxygen typically exists as a diatomic molecule as [math]\displaystyle{ \text{O}_2 }[/math]). Dalton was unable to distinguish between atoms and molecules (groups of atoms).

Amedeo Avogadro: Avogadro's Law

In 1811, Amedeo Avogadro studied gases and determined that the amount of volume a gas occupies is not determined by the mass of the gas. This allowed Avogadro to take more accurate atomic measurements of gases than Dalton, and differentiate atoms from molecules.

Robert Brown: Brownian Motion

A Scottish botanist, Robert Brown, studied the motion of tiny pollen particles in water in 1827. The particles followed complex paths, dubbed Brownian Motion. As early as 1905, Albert Einstein used Brownian Motion to predict the size of atoms and molecules.

J.J. Thomson: The Plum-Pudding Model and Electrons

Tomson's Plum-Pudding Model

Through his work with cathode rays, J.J. Thomson discovered the electron in 1897, and was the first to learn that atoms weren't actually "uncuttable" as initially thought. Thomson knew that atoms had a net neutral charge, but he only knew that negative particles existed. Thus, Thomson developed the "plum-pudding" model of negatively charged electrons floating in a sea of positive charge. (He likened the relationship of electrons to the sea of positive charge to that of plums in plum pudding.)

Ernest Rutherford: Gold Foil Experiment and the Nucleus

In 1909, one of Thomson's students, Ernest Rutherford, determined that the positive charge of atoms was located in a central nucleus. He shot small, positively charged alpha particles at thin sheets of gold foil and noted that some particles were sharply deflected. This deflection could only occur if the positive components of atoms were located in a small area, which Rutherford assumed to be the center. He proposed a planetary model of atoms where a cloud of electrons surrounded a central, positively charged nucleus.

Niels Bohr: Introducing Quantum Physics

The Bohr model for a Hydrogen atom with its electron moving between energy levels

As quantum mechanics progressed through the work of Albert Einstein and Max Planck, Niels Bohr updated the atomic model in 1913 to account for quantum phenomena. Bohr, who was also one of Rutherford's students, suggested that electrostatic forces kept electrons in circular orbit around the positively charged central nucleus. In support of his theory, Bohr examined the behavior of electrons in hydrogen molecules and noted that they followed distinct energy levels. When an electron changed energy levels, it gained or lost energy, which could be emitted in the form of light. While the Bohr model holds true for hydrogen, it isn't accurate for multi-electron elements.

James Chadwick: Neutrons

James Chadwick won a Nobel Prize in 1935 for his discovery of the neutron. Starting with Rutherford's work, Chadwick continued experimenting to determine the excess mass in the nucleus that wasn't accounted for by protons. He found that neutrally charged particles, dubbed neutrons, were also inside the nucleus.

The Current Model: Quantum Physics and Electron Orbitals

Erwin Schrödinger examined the possibility that moving electrons behaved more like waves than particles, and published "Schrödinger's Equation" in 1926. Although this resolved many issues encountered with the Bohr model, it faced opposition from physicist Max Born. Instead, Born suggested a wave-particle duality of electrons, which stated that electrons could behave both like a wave and a particle. As electrons were now given properties of waves, it was impossible to simultaneously determine an electron's exact location and momentum around the nucleus. Werner Heisenberg, first described this phenomena in 1927, and it was later named the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. This refuted the Bohr model of the atom, and replaced it with a pattern of probabilities as to where electrons are located around the nucleus. These patterns are referred to as atomic orbitals and come in a variety of shapes (basic spheres, rings, dumbbells, etc.) and the nucleus is always at the center.

The first five atomic orbitals: 1s, 2s, 2px, 2py, and 2pz.


Connectedness

While classical physics applies to large objects moving much slower than the speed of light, modern physics deals with special cases of tiny objects, like atoms, subject to relativistic effects. Atomic theory is vital to understanding many quantum physics concepts that are covered in both Physics 2211 and 2212, like the ball-and-spring model of solids, point charges, and conductivity.

Although one can argue physics applies to just about every aspect of life, and atomic theory is critical to understanding physics, atomic theory has directly influenced material science, power generation, electronics, and even food processing, to name a few.

See also

Notable Scientists

Related Theories

Concept Application

External links

References

1. “Atomic Theory.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 19 Feb. 2022, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_theory.

2. Introduction to Atomistic Modeling Xxx Techniques. https://web.mit.edu/mbuehler/www/Teaching/LS/lecture_1_nano-macro-buehler.pdf.

3. Clark, S J. “Atomistic Models.” Atomistic Models, http://cmt.dur.ac.uk/sjc/thesis_dlc/node45.html.

4. Introduction to Atomistic Modeling Xxx Techniques. https://web.mit.edu/mbuehler/www/Teaching/LS/lecture_1_nano-macro-buehler.pdf.

5. “Matter Wave.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 3 Apr. 2022, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_wave.

6. “Atomistic Modeling.” Atomistic Modeling - an Overview | ScienceDirect Topics, https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/atomistic-modeling.

7. Introduction to Atomistic Modeling Xxx Techniques. https://web.mit.edu/mbuehler/www/Teaching/LS/lecture_1_nano-macro-buehler.pdf.

Chapter 30 of OpenStax Textbook

Physics Portal page on Atomic Theory