<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Pnarala3</id>
	<title>Physics Book - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Pnarala3"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/Special:Contributions/Pnarala3"/>
	<updated>2026-06-10T00:12:26Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.7</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48024</id>
		<title>Charged Disk</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48024"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T01:09:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Spring 2026)&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a charged disk can be understood as the total electric field produced by all of the small pieces of charge on the disk. By using the Law of Superposition, we can treat the disk as many thin charged rings and add their electric field contributions together. Because the disk is symmetric, the sideways components of the electric field cancel along the central axis, leaving only a field in the z-direction. This idea is especially useful for understanding capacitors, since two oppositely charged metal disks or plates can create a nearly constant electric field between them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before we begin our calculations, take a look at this image of a uniformly charged disk:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_6.png|400px|thumb|Figure 1: diagram of a uniformly charged disk]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This image shows a visual representation of a disk. It should look pretty familiar. In fact, the shape of a disk is simply an extension of a [http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Charged_Ring ring]. Think of it as infinitely many uniformly charged rings. Thinking of a disk this way will help to understand the equation of the electric field for a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the equation for the electric field of a uniformly charged ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E= \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0}\frac{qz}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This equation will tell you the electric field of a uniformly charged ring at any observation location z. To apply this equation to a disk, integration will be involved. The integration variable in this case should be the radius of the ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as that will change with the infinitely many concentric rings you have. However, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is nowhere to be found in the equation. But if the radius of each ring is different, what gets affected as a result?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\&lt;br /&gt;
 dq = Q\frac{area of ring}{area of disk} = \frac{π((r+dr)^2-r^2)}{πR^2} = \frac{π(r^2 - r^2 +2r*dr+ dr^2)}{πR^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assume that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is essentially zero compared to the non-squared differential term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dq= Q\frac{2πrdr}{πr^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here you see that the charge of each ring is different due to the changing radius. The charge changes by a factor of the area of the ring, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πrdr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, (if you roll out the ring, it is a rectangle with height &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) divided by the area of the disk, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; πr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging that in for the q variable in our integration, and then cancelling out some variables, will allow us to solve for the electric field of a disk: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ dE = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}\frac{zrdr}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we take the integral of this equation, and the result is this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, we have the equation that finds us the exact electric potential of a uniformly charged disk. You can still make approximations to make the formula simpler, however. If your observation location z is very close to the disk but not touching it, and is also significantly smaller than the radius of the disk (i.e. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the equation becomes this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most commonly seen form of this equation, and becomes very important when applied to the case of capacitors. A key aspect of the field in these situations is the fact that it&#039;s constant in space between two charged plates. This unique aspect of capacitors, which does not occur for any other type of charged geometry, allows for several novel applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Another Mathematical Derivation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The previous section showed how to derive the formula for the electric field of a disk by setting dq as a ring. However, it is possible to arrive at the same formula by setting dq to be a square, with one side of length rdθ and the other side being of length dr. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.glowscript.org/#/user/vritpatel/folder/MyPrograms/program/Wiki Computational Code] confirms that this method of derivation returns the expected values, pointing in the correct, expected direction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method involves the computation of a double-integral. While it is significantly harder to derive the formula using this method (and isn&#039;t expected to be known in the scope of PHYS 2212), this method is still valid. This example is meant to show that in physics, there can be multiple avenues by which to solve the same exact problem, some easier than others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This derivation will account for the properties of the disk. For example, the derivation will show that the x and y-components of the Electrical field will go to 0, due to the symmetry of the charged disk. The direction of the electrical field will depend on the charge of the disk. The derivation of the magnitude of the Electrical field of a disk is shown below using this new method. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vrits2ndDerivation.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to Computational Model: https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/7298995b3d04&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Users can drag around and zoom in and out to see different views of the model.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The code sets up the charged disk as a flat circular surface made of many small cyan points. Each cyan point represents a small piece of charge on the disk. The program then uses superposition by calculating the electric field contribution from each small charge piece and adding those contributions together.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The yellow arrows are placed at fixed sample locations to show the general electric field pattern around the disk. The red points are movable observation points, and each red point has an orange arrow attached to it. These orange arrows show the electric field at those specific observation locations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The slider controls the z-distance from the disk. When the slider is moved, the red points shift to a new distance from the disk, and the code recalculates the electric field at each point. The orange arrows then update their direction and length, so the simulation shows both how the field points and how its strength changes with distance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In what circumstance would you not use the approximate formula for calculating the electric field and have to use another formula?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_4.png|300px|thumb|Figure 2: Easy problem #1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This question is important, as this situation can come up a lot when solving physics problem. Remember that in the special case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you are allowed to use the approximate formula. But if that second condition, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is not true, then you must use the exact formula (listed above). Or, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you also must use the exact formula, as then the observation location is relatively far from the disk. So it is important to look at your &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; value when you decide which equation to use when finding the electric field of a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Medium===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_3.png|300px|thumb|Figure 3: Middling problem #2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk, with it&#039;s center on the origin, and a of radius 0.4 m is uniformly charged with charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = -4 * 10^{-7} C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. What is the electric field of this disk at a location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0,0,0.04&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a a pretty simple problem, as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so you can use the approximate formula: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \ E = \frac{4 * 10^{-7}}{2\epsilon_0π*(0.4)^{2}} = 4.5 * 10^{4}   N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Medium===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk, with its center at the origin and radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.60&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m, is uniformly charged with charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = 3.0 \times 10^{-6} C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. What is the electric field of this disk at a location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;0,0,0.20&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z = 0.20&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m is not much smaller than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R = 0.60&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m, we should use the full formula:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{\pi R^2}\left[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2 + z^2)^{1/2}}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{3.0 \times 10^{-6}}{\pi(0.60)^2}\left[1 - \frac{0.20}{((0.60)^2 + (0.20)^2)^{1/2}}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = 1.04 \times 10^5 \ N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the disk is positively charged, the electric field points in the positive z-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_2.png|300px|thumb|Figure 4: Difficult problem #3 diagram]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk located with a center at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m is uniformly charged with an excess of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;7.46 * 10^{-6} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons. Find the radius of the disk if it generates an electric field of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = 2.2 * 10^{3} N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we don&#039;t know the radius of the disk, we cannot be sure that using the approximation would be accurate, because we don&#039;t know if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We must use the full formula, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start by calculating Q, knowing that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = e * -1.602 * 10^{-19} = -1.2 * 10^{-6} C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, we find z, which is essentially the distance from the center of the disk to the observation point. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z = mag( &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; ) = 0.75 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, we use the original equation for electric field to solve for R. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 2.6 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m. If we solve it using the approximated formula,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We calculate &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 3.13 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which has a significant amount of error from the original formula calculation. This indicates that using the approximation in this scenario would not have been appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
Uniformly charged disks are a fundamental component to capacitors (which is two disks placed parallel to each other), which are found everywhere in physics courses as well as the real world. They are key parts of LC circuits, RC circuits, batteries, signal processing, and can even produce light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Television&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capacitors and charged plates used to play a heavy role in televisions! Charged plates were used to accelerate electrons, which were then manipulated and directed by magnetic fields to control what area of the television screen they would strike. As they hit the screen, a certain chemical would glow a specific color, generating an image. So every time you woke up early on saturday morning (before the advent of flat screen televisions), your episodes of Spongebob and Fairly OddParents was brought to you by capacitors!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Chemical Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric fields of capacitors may seem completely unrelated to chemical engineering. But actually, there are a surprising number of applications within chemical engineering. For example, much of the instrumentation used in chemical processes rely on capacitors and their ability to generate constant electric fields between two charged plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Industrial Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary careers in chemical engineering focuses on operating, maintaining, and optimizing a chemical plant or refinery. In a refinery, there are thousands of things you have to monitor throughout the plant. Every pipe and vessel holding liquid or gas is susceptible to corrosion, and any breach in containment could jeapordize thousands of lives. One of the most common causes of corrosion is ionic contaminants in water. Before a method was found to monitor and troubleshoot the ion concentrations in water, there were numerous dangerous corrosion events that put people&#039;s lives in danger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, we monitor the conductivity of water in a refinery. This is done using CAPACITORS. Essentially, capacitors are used to monitor the changing electric field and dielectric properties of the water running through it. This data is then analyzed to find the amount of ionic contaminant in the water, allowing the chemical engineer to prevent corrosion at the source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The first capacitor was invented in 1746. It was called the Leyden Jar, and it was essentially a glass jar wrapped in aluminum on both sides. They were used initially to store charge, almost as a battery. With the advent of radio technologies, capacitors played a key role in producing and receiving radio signals. Thus, they were heavily improved due to the demand from the radio industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dielectric_2.png|400px|center|thumb|Figure 5: a capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As technology progressed, capacitors were developed that were smaller and more compact, allowing broad uses and applications. These ranged from diverse circuits to incredibly powerful transmitters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.webassign.net/ebooks/mi4/toc.html? Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5UyXkFCg5s Video: Electric Field Due to a Charged Disk, Infinite Sheet of Charge, Parallel Plates - Physics Problems]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/phys208/exercises/kevan/efield1.html Solved problems for the electric field of a ring, disk, and plane]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/category/physics PhET Simulations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/index-e.html VPython Physics Programs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor Further Online Reading]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: all images were created by author&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:What category did you place this in?]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48023</id>
		<title>Charged Disk</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48023"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T01:08:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Spring 2026)&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a charged disk can be understood as the total electric field produced by all of the small pieces of charge on the disk. By using the Law of Superposition, we can treat the disk as many thin charged rings and add their electric field contributions together. Because the disk is symmetric, the sideways components of the electric field cancel along the central axis, leaving only a field in the z-direction. This idea is especially useful for understanding capacitors, since two oppositely charged metal disks or plates can create a nearly constant electric field between them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before we begin our calculations, take a look at this image of a uniformly charged disk:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_6.png|400px|thumb|Figure 1: diagram of a uniformly charged disk]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This image shows a visual representation of a disk. It should look pretty familiar. In fact, the shape of a disk is simply an extension of a [http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Charged_Ring ring]. Think of it as infinitely many uniformly charged rings. Thinking of a disk this way will help to understand the equation of the electric field for a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the equation for the electric field of a uniformly charged ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E= \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0}\frac{qz}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This equation will tell you the electric field of a uniformly charged ring at any observation location z. To apply this equation to a disk, integration will be involved. The integration variable in this case should be the radius of the ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as that will change with the infinitely many concentric rings you have. However, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is nowhere to be found in the equation. But if the radius of each ring is different, what gets affected as a result?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\&lt;br /&gt;
 dq = Q\frac{area of ring}{area of disk} = \frac{π((r+dr)^2-r^2)}{πR^2} = \frac{π(r^2 - r^2 +2r*dr+ dr^2)}{πR^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assume that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is essentially zero compared to the non-squared differential term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dq= Q\frac{2πrdr}{πr^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here you see that the charge of each ring is different due to the changing radius. The charge changes by a factor of the area of the ring, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πrdr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, (if you roll out the ring, it is a rectangle with height &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) divided by the area of the disk, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; πr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging that in for the q variable in our integration, and then cancelling out some variables, will allow us to solve for the electric field of a disk: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ dE = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}\frac{zrdr}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we take the integral of this equation, and the result is this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, we have the equation that finds us the exact electric potential of a uniformly charged disk. You can still make approximations to make the formula simpler, however. If your observation location z is very close to the disk but not touching it, and is also significantly smaller than the radius of the disk (i.e. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the equation becomes this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most commonly seen form of this equation, and becomes very important when applied to the case of capacitors. A key aspect of the field in these situations is the fact that it&#039;s constant in space between two charged plates. This unique aspect of capacitors, which does not occur for any other type of charged geometry, allows for several novel applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Another Mathematical Derivation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The previous section showed how to derive the formula for the electric field of a disk by setting dq as a ring. However, it is possible to arrive at the same formula by setting dq to be a square, with one side of length rdθ and the other side being of length dr. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.glowscript.org/#/user/vritpatel/folder/MyPrograms/program/Wiki Computational Code] confirms that this method of derivation returns the expected values, pointing in the correct, expected direction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method involves the computation of a double-integral. While it is significantly harder to derive the formula using this method (and isn&#039;t expected to be known in the scope of PHYS 2212), this method is still valid. This example is meant to show that in physics, there can be multiple avenues by which to solve the same exact problem, some easier than others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This derivation will account for the properties of the disk. For example, the derivation will show that the x and y-components of the Electrical field will go to 0, due to the symmetry of the charged disk. The direction of the electrical field will depend on the charge of the disk. The derivation of the magnitude of the Electrical field of a disk is shown below using this new method. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vrits2ndDerivation.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to Computational Model: https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/7298995b3d04&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Users can drag around and zoom in and out to see different views of the model.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The code sets up the charged disk as a flat circular surface made of many small cyan points. Each cyan point represents a small piece of charge on the disk. The program then uses superposition by calculating the electric field contribution from each small charge piece and adding those contributions together.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The yellow arrows are placed at fixed sample locations to show the general electric field pattern around the disk. The red points are movable observation points, and each red point has an orange arrow attached to it. These orange arrows show the electric field at those specific observation locations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The slider controls the z-distance from the disk. When the slider is moved, the red points shift to a new distance from the disk, and the code recalculates the electric field at each point. The orange arrows then update their direction and length, so the simulation shows both how the field points and how its strength changes with distance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In what circumstance would you not use the approximate formula for calculating the electric field and have to use another formula?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_4.png|300px|thumb|Figure 2: Easy problem #1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This question is important, as this situation can come up a lot when solving physics problem. Remember that in the special case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you are allowed to use the approximate formula. But if that second condition, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is not true, then you must use the exact formula (listed above). Or, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you also must use the exact formula, as then the observation location is relatively far from the disk. So it is important to look at your &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; value when you decide which equation to use when finding the electric field of a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Medium===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_3.png|300px|thumb|Figure 3: Middling problem #2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk, with it&#039;s center on the origin, and a of radius 0.4 m is uniformly charged with charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = -4 * 10^{-7} C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. What is the electric field of this disk at a location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0,0,0.04&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a a pretty simple problem, as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so you can use the approximate formula: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \ E = \frac{4 * 10^{-7}}{2\epsilon_0π*(0.4)^{2}} = 4.5 * 10^{4}   N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Medium===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk, with its center at the origin and radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.60&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m, is uniformly charged with charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = 3.0 * 10^{-6} C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. What is the electric field of this disk at a location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;0,0,0.20&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z = 0.20&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m is not much smaller than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R = 0.60&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m, we should use the full formula:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{\pi R^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{3.0 * 10^{-6}}{\pi(0.60)^2}[1 - \frac{0.20}{((0.60)^2+(0.20)^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = 1.04 * 10^5 \ N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the disk is positively charged, the electric field points in the positive z-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_2.png|300px|thumb|Figure 4: Difficult problem #3 diagram]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk located with a center at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m is uniformly charged with an excess of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;7.46 * 10^{-6} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons. Find the radius of the disk if it generates an electric field of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = 2.2 * 10^{3} N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we don&#039;t know the radius of the disk, we cannot be sure that using the approximation would be accurate, because we don&#039;t know if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We must use the full formula, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start by calculating Q, knowing that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = e * -1.602 * 10^{-19} = -1.2 * 10^{-6} C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, we find z, which is essentially the distance from the center of the disk to the observation point. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z = mag( &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; ) = 0.75 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, we use the original equation for electric field to solve for R. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 2.6 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m. If we solve it using the approximated formula,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We calculate &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 3.13 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which has a significant amount of error from the original formula calculation. This indicates that using the approximation in this scenario would not have been appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
Uniformly charged disks are a fundamental component to capacitors (which is two disks placed parallel to each other), which are found everywhere in physics courses as well as the real world. They are key parts of LC circuits, RC circuits, batteries, signal processing, and can even produce light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Television&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capacitors and charged plates used to play a heavy role in televisions! Charged plates were used to accelerate electrons, which were then manipulated and directed by magnetic fields to control what area of the television screen they would strike. As they hit the screen, a certain chemical would glow a specific color, generating an image. So every time you woke up early on saturday morning (before the advent of flat screen televisions), your episodes of Spongebob and Fairly OddParents was brought to you by capacitors!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Chemical Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric fields of capacitors may seem completely unrelated to chemical engineering. But actually, there are a surprising number of applications within chemical engineering. For example, much of the instrumentation used in chemical processes rely on capacitors and their ability to generate constant electric fields between two charged plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Industrial Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary careers in chemical engineering focuses on operating, maintaining, and optimizing a chemical plant or refinery. In a refinery, there are thousands of things you have to monitor throughout the plant. Every pipe and vessel holding liquid or gas is susceptible to corrosion, and any breach in containment could jeapordize thousands of lives. One of the most common causes of corrosion is ionic contaminants in water. Before a method was found to monitor and troubleshoot the ion concentrations in water, there were numerous dangerous corrosion events that put people&#039;s lives in danger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, we monitor the conductivity of water in a refinery. This is done using CAPACITORS. Essentially, capacitors are used to monitor the changing electric field and dielectric properties of the water running through it. This data is then analyzed to find the amount of ionic contaminant in the water, allowing the chemical engineer to prevent corrosion at the source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The first capacitor was invented in 1746. It was called the Leyden Jar, and it was essentially a glass jar wrapped in aluminum on both sides. They were used initially to store charge, almost as a battery. With the advent of radio technologies, capacitors played a key role in producing and receiving radio signals. Thus, they were heavily improved due to the demand from the radio industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dielectric_2.png|400px|center|thumb|Figure 5: a capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As technology progressed, capacitors were developed that were smaller and more compact, allowing broad uses and applications. These ranged from diverse circuits to incredibly powerful transmitters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.webassign.net/ebooks/mi4/toc.html? Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5UyXkFCg5s Video: Electric Field Due to a Charged Disk, Infinite Sheet of Charge, Parallel Plates - Physics Problems]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/phys208/exercises/kevan/efield1.html Solved problems for the electric field of a ring, disk, and plane]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/category/physics PhET Simulations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/index-e.html VPython Physics Programs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor Further Online Reading]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: all images were created by author&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:What category did you place this in?]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48022</id>
		<title>Charged Disk</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48022"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T01:07:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Spring 2026)&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a charged disk can be understood as the total electric field produced by all of the small pieces of charge on the disk. By using the Law of Superposition, we can treat the disk as many thin charged rings and add their electric field contributions together. Because the disk is symmetric, the sideways components of the electric field cancel along the central axis, leaving only a field in the z-direction. This idea is especially useful for understanding capacitors, since two oppositely charged metal disks or plates can create a nearly constant electric field between them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before we begin our calculations, take a look at this image of a uniformly charged disk:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_6.png|400px|thumb|Figure 1: diagram of a uniformly charged disk]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This image shows a visual representation of a disk. It should look pretty familiar. In fact, the shape of a disk is simply an extension of a [http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Charged_Ring ring]. Think of it as infinitely many uniformly charged rings. Thinking of a disk this way will help to understand the equation of the electric field for a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the equation for the electric field of a uniformly charged ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E= \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0}\frac{qz}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This equation will tell you the electric field of a uniformly charged ring at any observation location z. To apply this equation to a disk, integration will be involved. The integration variable in this case should be the radius of the ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as that will change with the infinitely many concentric rings you have. However, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is nowhere to be found in the equation. But if the radius of each ring is different, what gets affected as a result?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\&lt;br /&gt;
 dq = Q\frac{area of ring}{area of disk} = \frac{π((r+dr)^2-r^2)}{πR^2} = \frac{π(r^2 - r^2 +2r*dr+ dr^2)}{πR^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assume that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is essentially zero compared to the non-squared differential term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dq= Q\frac{2πrdr}{πr^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here you see that the charge of each ring is different due to the changing radius. The charge changes by a factor of the area of the ring, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πrdr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, (if you roll out the ring, it is a rectangle with height &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) divided by the area of the disk, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; πr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging that in for the q variable in our integration, and then cancelling out some variables, will allow us to solve for the electric field of a disk: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ dE = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}\frac{zrdr}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we take the integral of this equation, and the result is this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, we have the equation that finds us the exact electric potential of a uniformly charged disk. You can still make approximations to make the formula simpler, however. If your observation location z is very close to the disk but not touching it, and is also significantly smaller than the radius of the disk (i.e. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the equation becomes this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most commonly seen form of this equation, and becomes very important when applied to the case of capacitors. A key aspect of the field in these situations is the fact that it&#039;s constant in space between two charged plates. This unique aspect of capacitors, which does not occur for any other type of charged geometry, allows for several novel applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Another Mathematical Derivation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The previous section showed how to derive the formula for the electric field of a disk by setting dq as a ring. However, it is possible to arrive at the same formula by setting dq to be a square, with one side of length rdθ and the other side being of length dr. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.glowscript.org/#/user/vritpatel/folder/MyPrograms/program/Wiki Computational Code] confirms that this method of derivation returns the expected values, pointing in the correct, expected direction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method involves the computation of a double-integral. While it is significantly harder to derive the formula using this method (and isn&#039;t expected to be known in the scope of PHYS 2212), this method is still valid. This example is meant to show that in physics, there can be multiple avenues by which to solve the same exact problem, some easier than others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This derivation will account for the properties of the disk. For example, the derivation will show that the x and y-components of the Electrical field will go to 0, due to the symmetry of the charged disk. The direction of the electrical field will depend on the charge of the disk. The derivation of the magnitude of the Electrical field of a disk is shown below using this new method. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vrits2ndDerivation.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to Computational Model: https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/7298995b3d04&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Users can drag around and zoom in and out to see different views of the model.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The code sets up the charged disk as a flat circular surface made of many small cyan points. Each cyan point represents a small piece of charge on the disk. The program then uses superposition by calculating the electric field contribution from each small charge piece and adding those contributions together.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The yellow arrows are placed at fixed sample locations to show the general electric field pattern around the disk. The red points are movable observation points, and each red point has an orange arrow attached to it. These orange arrows show the electric field at those specific observation locations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The slider controls the z-distance from the disk. When the slider is moved, the red points shift to a new distance from the disk, and the code recalculates the electric field at each point. The orange arrows then update their direction and length, so the simulation shows both how the field points and how its strength changes with distance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In what circumstance would you not use the approximate formula for calculating the electric field and have to use another formula?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_4.png|300px|thumb|Figure 2: Easy problem #1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This question is important, as this situation can come up a lot when solving physics problem. Remember that in the special case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you are allowed to use the approximate formula. But if that second condition, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is not true, then you must use the exact formula (listed above). Or, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you also must use the exact formula, as then the observation location is relatively far from the disk. So it is important to look at your &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; value when you decide which equation to use when finding the electric field of a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_3.png|300px|thumb|Figure 3: Middling problem #2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk, with it&#039;s center on the origin, and a of radius 0.4 m is uniformly charged with charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = -4 * 10^{-7} C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. What is the electric field of this disk at a location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0,0,0.04&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a a pretty simple problem, as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so you can use the approximate formula: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \ E = \frac{4 * 10^{-7}}{2\epsilon_0π*(0.4)^{2}} = 4.5 * 10^{4}   N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk, with its center at the origin and radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0.60&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m, is uniformly charged with charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = 3.0 * 10^{-6} C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. What is the electric field of this disk at a location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;0,0,0.20&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z = 0.20&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m is not much smaller than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R = 0.60&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m, we should use the full formula:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{\pi R^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{3.0 * 10^{-6}}{\pi(0.60)^2}[1 - \frac{0.20}{((0.60)^2+(0.20)^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = 1.04 * 10^5 \ N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the disk is positively charged, the electric field points in the positive z-direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_2.png|300px|thumb|Figure 4: Difficult problem #3 diagram]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk located with a center at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m is uniformly charged with an excess of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;7.46 * 10^{-6} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons. Find the radius of the disk if it generates an electric field of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = 2.2 * 10^{3} N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we don&#039;t know the radius of the disk, we cannot be sure that using the approximation would be accurate, because we don&#039;t know if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We must use the full formula, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start by calculating Q, knowing that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = e * -1.602 * 10^{-19} = -1.2 * 10^{-6} C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, we find z, which is essentially the distance from the center of the disk to the observation point. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z = mag( &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; ) = 0.75 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, we use the original equation for electric field to solve for R. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 2.6 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m. If we solve it using the approximated formula,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We calculate &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 3.13 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which has a significant amount of error from the original formula calculation. This indicates that using the approximation in this scenario would not have been appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
Uniformly charged disks are a fundamental component to capacitors (which is two disks placed parallel to each other), which are found everywhere in physics courses as well as the real world. They are key parts of LC circuits, RC circuits, batteries, signal processing, and can even produce light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Television&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capacitors and charged plates used to play a heavy role in televisions! Charged plates were used to accelerate electrons, which were then manipulated and directed by magnetic fields to control what area of the television screen they would strike. As they hit the screen, a certain chemical would glow a specific color, generating an image. So every time you woke up early on saturday morning (before the advent of flat screen televisions), your episodes of Spongebob and Fairly OddParents was brought to you by capacitors!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Chemical Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric fields of capacitors may seem completely unrelated to chemical engineering. But actually, there are a surprising number of applications within chemical engineering. For example, much of the instrumentation used in chemical processes rely on capacitors and their ability to generate constant electric fields between two charged plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Industrial Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary careers in chemical engineering focuses on operating, maintaining, and optimizing a chemical plant or refinery. In a refinery, there are thousands of things you have to monitor throughout the plant. Every pipe and vessel holding liquid or gas is susceptible to corrosion, and any breach in containment could jeapordize thousands of lives. One of the most common causes of corrosion is ionic contaminants in water. Before a method was found to monitor and troubleshoot the ion concentrations in water, there were numerous dangerous corrosion events that put people&#039;s lives in danger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, we monitor the conductivity of water in a refinery. This is done using CAPACITORS. Essentially, capacitors are used to monitor the changing electric field and dielectric properties of the water running through it. This data is then analyzed to find the amount of ionic contaminant in the water, allowing the chemical engineer to prevent corrosion at the source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The first capacitor was invented in 1746. It was called the Leyden Jar, and it was essentially a glass jar wrapped in aluminum on both sides. They were used initially to store charge, almost as a battery. With the advent of radio technologies, capacitors played a key role in producing and receiving radio signals. Thus, they were heavily improved due to the demand from the radio industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dielectric_2.png|400px|center|thumb|Figure 5: a capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As technology progressed, capacitors were developed that were smaller and more compact, allowing broad uses and applications. These ranged from diverse circuits to incredibly powerful transmitters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.webassign.net/ebooks/mi4/toc.html? Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5UyXkFCg5s Video: Electric Field Due to a Charged Disk, Infinite Sheet of Charge, Parallel Plates - Physics Problems]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/phys208/exercises/kevan/efield1.html Solved problems for the electric field of a ring, disk, and plane]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/category/physics PhET Simulations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/index-e.html VPython Physics Programs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor Further Online Reading]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: all images were created by author&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:What category did you place this in?]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48021</id>
		<title>Charged Disk</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48021"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T01:04:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Spring 2026)&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a charged disk can be understood as the total electric field produced by all of the small pieces of charge on the disk. By using the Law of Superposition, we can treat the disk as many thin charged rings and add their electric field contributions together. Because the disk is symmetric, the sideways components of the electric field cancel along the central axis, leaving only a field in the z-direction. This idea is especially useful for understanding capacitors, since two oppositely charged metal disks or plates can create a nearly constant electric field between them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before we begin our calculations, take a look at this image of a uniformly charged disk:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_6.png|400px|thumb|Figure 1: diagram of a uniformly charged disk]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This image shows a visual representation of a disk. It should look pretty familiar. In fact, the shape of a disk is simply an extension of a [http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Charged_Ring ring]. Think of it as infinitely many uniformly charged rings. Thinking of a disk this way will help to understand the equation of the electric field for a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the equation for the electric field of a uniformly charged ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E= \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0}\frac{qz}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This equation will tell you the electric field of a uniformly charged ring at any observation location z. To apply this equation to a disk, integration will be involved. The integration variable in this case should be the radius of the ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as that will change with the infinitely many concentric rings you have. However, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is nowhere to be found in the equation. But if the radius of each ring is different, what gets affected as a result?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\&lt;br /&gt;
 dq = Q\frac{area of ring}{area of disk} = \frac{π((r+dr)^2-r^2)}{πR^2} = \frac{π(r^2 - r^2 +2r*dr+ dr^2)}{πR^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assume that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is essentially zero compared to the non-squared differential term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dq= Q\frac{2πrdr}{πr^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here you see that the charge of each ring is different due to the changing radius. The charge changes by a factor of the area of the ring, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πrdr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, (if you roll out the ring, it is a rectangle with height &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) divided by the area of the disk, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; πr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging that in for the q variable in our integration, and then cancelling out some variables, will allow us to solve for the electric field of a disk: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ dE = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}\frac{zrdr}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we take the integral of this equation, and the result is this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, we have the equation that finds us the exact electric potential of a uniformly charged disk. You can still make approximations to make the formula simpler, however. If your observation location z is very close to the disk but not touching it, and is also significantly smaller than the radius of the disk (i.e. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the equation becomes this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most commonly seen form of this equation, and becomes very important when applied to the case of capacitors. A key aspect of the field in these situations is the fact that it&#039;s constant in space between two charged plates. This unique aspect of capacitors, which does not occur for any other type of charged geometry, allows for several novel applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Another Mathematical Derivation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The previous section showed how to derive the formula for the electric field of a disk by setting dq as a ring. However, it is possible to arrive at the same formula by setting dq to be a square, with one side of length rdθ and the other side being of length dr. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.glowscript.org/#/user/vritpatel/folder/MyPrograms/program/Wiki Computational Code] confirms that this method of derivation returns the expected values, pointing in the correct, expected direction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method involves the computation of a double-integral. While it is significantly harder to derive the formula using this method (and isn&#039;t expected to be known in the scope of PHYS 2212), this method is still valid. This example is meant to show that in physics, there can be multiple avenues by which to solve the same exact problem, some easier than others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This derivation will account for the properties of the disk. For example, the derivation will show that the x and y-components of the Electrical field will go to 0, due to the symmetry of the charged disk. The direction of the electrical field will depend on the charge of the disk. The derivation of the magnitude of the Electrical field of a disk is shown below using this new method. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vrits2ndDerivation.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to Computational Model: https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/7298995b3d04&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Users can drag around and zoom in and out to see different views of the model.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The code sets up the charged disk as a flat circular surface made of many small cyan points. Each cyan point represents a small piece of charge on the disk. The program then uses superposition by calculating the electric field contribution from each small charge piece and adding those contributions together.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The yellow arrows are placed at fixed sample locations to show the general electric field pattern around the disk. The red points are movable observation points, and each red point has an orange arrow attached to it. These orange arrows show the electric field at those specific observation locations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The slider controls the z-distance from the disk. When the slider is moved, the red points shift to a new distance from the disk, and the code recalculates the electric field at each point. The orange arrows then update their direction and length, so the simulation shows both how the field points and how its strength changes with distance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In what circumstance would you not use the approximate formula for calculating the electric field and have to use another formula?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_4.png|300px|thumb|Figure 2: Easy problem #1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This question is important, as this situation can come up a lot when solving physics problem. Remember that in the special case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you are allowed to use the approximate formula. But if that second condition, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is not true, then you must use the exact formula (listed above). Or, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you also must use the exact formula, as then the observation location is relatively far from the disk. So it is important to look at your &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; value when you decide which equation to use when finding the electric field of a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_3.png|300px|thumb|Figure 3: Middling problem #2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk, with it&#039;s center on the origin, and a of radius 0.4 m is uniformly charged with charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = -4 * 10^{-7} C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. What is the electric field of this disk at a location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0,0,0.04&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a a pretty simple problem, as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so you can use the approximate formula: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \ E = \frac{4 * 10^{-7}}{2\epsilon_0π*(0.4)^{2}} = 4.5 * 10^{4}   N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_2.png|300px|thumb|Figure 4: Difficult problem #3 diagram]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk located with a center at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m is uniformly charged with an excess of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;7.46 * 10^{-6} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons. Find the radius of the disk if it generates an electric field of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = 2.2 * 10^{3} N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we don&#039;t know the radius of the disk, we cannot be sure that using the approximation would be accurate, because we don&#039;t know if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We must use the full formula, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start by calculating Q, knowing that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = e * -1.602 * 10^{-19} = -1.2 * 10^{-6} C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, we find z, which is essentially the distance from the center of the disk to the observation point. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z = mag( &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; ) = 0.75 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, we use the original equation for electric field to solve for R. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 2.6 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m. If we solve it using the approximated formula,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We calculate &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 3.13 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which has a significant amount of error from the original formula calculation. This indicates that using the approximation in this scenario would not have been appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
Uniformly charged disks are a fundamental component to capacitors (which is two disks placed parallel to each other), which are found everywhere in physics courses as well as the real world. They are key parts of LC circuits, RC circuits, batteries, signal processing, and can even produce light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Television&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capacitors and charged plates used to play a heavy role in televisions! Charged plates were used to accelerate electrons, which were then manipulated and directed by magnetic fields to control what area of the television screen they would strike. As they hit the screen, a certain chemical would glow a specific color, generating an image. So every time you woke up early on saturday morning (before the advent of flat screen televisions), your episodes of Spongebob and Fairly OddParents was brought to you by capacitors!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Chemical Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric fields of capacitors may seem completely unrelated to chemical engineering. But actually, there are a surprising number of applications within chemical engineering. For example, much of the instrumentation used in chemical processes rely on capacitors and their ability to generate constant electric fields between two charged plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Industrial Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary careers in chemical engineering focuses on operating, maintaining, and optimizing a chemical plant or refinery. In a refinery, there are thousands of things you have to monitor throughout the plant. Every pipe and vessel holding liquid or gas is susceptible to corrosion, and any breach in containment could jeapordize thousands of lives. One of the most common causes of corrosion is ionic contaminants in water. Before a method was found to monitor and troubleshoot the ion concentrations in water, there were numerous dangerous corrosion events that put people&#039;s lives in danger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, we monitor the conductivity of water in a refinery. This is done using CAPACITORS. Essentially, capacitors are used to monitor the changing electric field and dielectric properties of the water running through it. This data is then analyzed to find the amount of ionic contaminant in the water, allowing the chemical engineer to prevent corrosion at the source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The first capacitor was invented in 1746. It was called the Leyden Jar, and it was essentially a glass jar wrapped in aluminum on both sides. They were used initially to store charge, almost as a battery. With the advent of radio technologies, capacitors played a key role in producing and receiving radio signals. Thus, they were heavily improved due to the demand from the radio industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dielectric_2.png|400px|center|thumb|Figure 5: a capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As technology progressed, capacitors were developed that were smaller and more compact, allowing broad uses and applications. These ranged from diverse circuits to incredibly powerful transmitters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.webassign.net/ebooks/mi4/toc.html? Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5UyXkFCg5s Video: Electric Field Due to a Charged Disk, Infinite Sheet of Charge, Parallel Plates - Physics Problems]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/phys208/exercises/kevan/efield1.html Solved problems for the electric field of a ring, disk, and plane]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/category/physics PhET Simulations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/index-e.html VPython Physics Programs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor Further Online Reading]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: all images were created by author&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:What category did you place this in?]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48020</id>
		<title>Charged Disk</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48020"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T01:03:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Spring 2026)&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a charged disk can be understood as the total electric field produced by all of the small pieces of charge on the disk. By using the Law of Superposition, we can treat the disk as many thin charged rings and add their electric field contributions together. Because the disk is symmetric, the sideways components of the electric field cancel along the central axis, leaving only a field in the z-direction. This idea is especially useful for understanding capacitors, since two oppositely charged metal disks or plates can create a nearly constant electric field between them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before we begin our calculations, take a look at this image of a uniformly charged disk:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_6.png|400px|thumb|Figure 1: diagram of a uniformly charged disk]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This image shows a visual representation of a disk. It should look pretty familiar. In fact, the shape of a disk is simply an extension of a [http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Charged_Ring ring]. Think of it as infinitely many uniformly charged rings. Thinking of a disk this way will help to understand the equation of the electric field for a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the equation for the electric field of a uniformly charged ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E= \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0}\frac{qz}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This equation will tell you the electric field of a uniformly charged ring at any observation location z. To apply this equation to a disk, integration will be involved. The integration variable in this case should be the radius of the ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as that will change with the infinitely many concentric rings you have. However, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is nowhere to be found in the equation. But if the radius of each ring is different, what gets affected as a result?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\&lt;br /&gt;
 dq = Q\frac{area of ring}{area of disk} = \frac{π((r+dr)^2-r^2)}{πR^2} = \frac{π(r^2 - r^2 +2r*dr+ dr^2)}{πR^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assume that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is essentially zero compared to the non-squared differential term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dq= Q\frac{2πrdr}{πr^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here you see that the charge of each ring is different due to the changing radius. The charge changes by a factor of the area of the ring, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πrdr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, (if you roll out the ring, it is a rectangle with height &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) divided by the area of the disk, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; πr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging that in for the q variable in our integration, and then cancelling out some variables, will allow us to solve for the electric field of a disk: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ dE = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}\frac{zrdr}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we take the integral of this equation, and the result is this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, we have the equation that finds us the exact electric potential of a uniformly charged disk. You can still make approximations to make the formula simpler, however. If your observation location z is very close to the disk but not touching it, and is also significantly smaller than the radius of the disk (i.e. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the equation becomes this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most commonly seen form of this equation, and becomes very important when applied to the case of capacitors. A key aspect of the field in these situations is the fact that it&#039;s constant in space between two charged plates. This unique aspect of capacitors, which does not occur for any other type of charged geometry, allows for several novel applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Another Mathematical Derivation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The previous section showed how to derive the formula for the electric field of a disk by setting dq as a ring. However, it is possible to arrive at the same formula by setting dq to be a square, with one side of length rdθ and the other side being of length dr. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.glowscript.org/#/user/vritpatel/folder/MyPrograms/program/Wiki Computational Code] confirms that this method of derivation returns the expected values, pointing in the correct, expected direction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method involves the computation of a double-integral. While it is significantly harder to derive the formula using this method (and isn&#039;t expected to be known in the scope of PHYS 2212), this method is still valid. This example is meant to show that in physics, there can be multiple avenues by which to solve the same exact problem, some easier than others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This derivation will account for the properties of the disk. For example, the derivation will show that the x and y-components of the Electrical field will go to 0, due to the symmetry of the charged disk. The direction of the electrical field will depend on the charge of the disk. The derivation of the magnitude of the Electrical field of a disk is shown below using this new method. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vrits2ndDerivation.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link to Computational Model: https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/7298995b3d04&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The code sets up the charged disk as a flat circular surface made of many small cyan points. Each cyan point represents a small piece of charge on the disk. The program then uses superposition by calculating the electric field contribution from each small charge piece and adding those contributions together.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The yellow arrows are placed at fixed sample locations to show the general electric field pattern around the disk. The red points are movable observation points, and each red point has an orange arrow attached to it. These orange arrows show the electric field at those specific observation locations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The slider controls the z-distance from the disk. When the slider is moved, the red points shift to a new distance from the disk, and the code recalculates the electric field at each point. The orange arrows then update their direction and length, so the simulation shows both how the field points and how its strength changes with distance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In what circumstance would you not use the approximate formula for calculating the electric field and have to use another formula?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_4.png|300px|thumb|Figure 2: Easy problem #1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This question is important, as this situation can come up a lot when solving physics problem. Remember that in the special case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you are allowed to use the approximate formula. But if that second condition, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is not true, then you must use the exact formula (listed above). Or, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you also must use the exact formula, as then the observation location is relatively far from the disk. So it is important to look at your &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; value when you decide which equation to use when finding the electric field of a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_3.png|300px|thumb|Figure 3: Middling problem #2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk, with it&#039;s center on the origin, and a of radius 0.4 m is uniformly charged with charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = -4 * 10^{-7} C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. What is the electric field of this disk at a location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0,0,0.04&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a a pretty simple problem, as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so you can use the approximate formula: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \ E = \frac{4 * 10^{-7}}{2\epsilon_0π*(0.4)^{2}} = 4.5 * 10^{4}   N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_2.png|300px|thumb|Figure 4: Difficult problem #3 diagram]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk located with a center at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m is uniformly charged with an excess of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;7.46 * 10^{-6} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons. Find the radius of the disk if it generates an electric field of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = 2.2 * 10^{3} N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we don&#039;t know the radius of the disk, we cannot be sure that using the approximation would be accurate, because we don&#039;t know if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We must use the full formula, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start by calculating Q, knowing that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = e * -1.602 * 10^{-19} = -1.2 * 10^{-6} C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, we find z, which is essentially the distance from the center of the disk to the observation point. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z = mag( &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; ) = 0.75 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, we use the original equation for electric field to solve for R. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 2.6 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m. If we solve it using the approximated formula,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We calculate &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 3.13 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which has a significant amount of error from the original formula calculation. This indicates that using the approximation in this scenario would not have been appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
Uniformly charged disks are a fundamental component to capacitors (which is two disks placed parallel to each other), which are found everywhere in physics courses as well as the real world. They are key parts of LC circuits, RC circuits, batteries, signal processing, and can even produce light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Television&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capacitors and charged plates used to play a heavy role in televisions! Charged plates were used to accelerate electrons, which were then manipulated and directed by magnetic fields to control what area of the television screen they would strike. As they hit the screen, a certain chemical would glow a specific color, generating an image. So every time you woke up early on saturday morning (before the advent of flat screen televisions), your episodes of Spongebob and Fairly OddParents was brought to you by capacitors!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Chemical Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric fields of capacitors may seem completely unrelated to chemical engineering. But actually, there are a surprising number of applications within chemical engineering. For example, much of the instrumentation used in chemical processes rely on capacitors and their ability to generate constant electric fields between two charged plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Industrial Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary careers in chemical engineering focuses on operating, maintaining, and optimizing a chemical plant or refinery. In a refinery, there are thousands of things you have to monitor throughout the plant. Every pipe and vessel holding liquid or gas is susceptible to corrosion, and any breach in containment could jeapordize thousands of lives. One of the most common causes of corrosion is ionic contaminants in water. Before a method was found to monitor and troubleshoot the ion concentrations in water, there were numerous dangerous corrosion events that put people&#039;s lives in danger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, we monitor the conductivity of water in a refinery. This is done using CAPACITORS. Essentially, capacitors are used to monitor the changing electric field and dielectric properties of the water running through it. This data is then analyzed to find the amount of ionic contaminant in the water, allowing the chemical engineer to prevent corrosion at the source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The first capacitor was invented in 1746. It was called the Leyden Jar, and it was essentially a glass jar wrapped in aluminum on both sides. They were used initially to store charge, almost as a battery. With the advent of radio technologies, capacitors played a key role in producing and receiving radio signals. Thus, they were heavily improved due to the demand from the radio industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dielectric_2.png|400px|center|thumb|Figure 5: a capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As technology progressed, capacitors were developed that were smaller and more compact, allowing broad uses and applications. These ranged from diverse circuits to incredibly powerful transmitters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.webassign.net/ebooks/mi4/toc.html? Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5UyXkFCg5s Video: Electric Field Due to a Charged Disk, Infinite Sheet of Charge, Parallel Plates - Physics Problems]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/phys208/exercises/kevan/efield1.html Solved problems for the electric field of a ring, disk, and plane]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/category/physics PhET Simulations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/index-e.html VPython Physics Programs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor Further Online Reading]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: all images were created by author&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:What category did you place this in?]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48018</id>
		<title>Charged Disk</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48018"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T00:59:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Spring 2026)&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a charged disk can be understood as the total electric field produced by all of the small pieces of charge on the disk. By using the Law of Superposition, we can treat the disk as many thin charged rings and add their electric field contributions together. Because the disk is symmetric, the sideways components of the electric field cancel along the central axis, leaving only a field in the z-direction. This idea is especially useful for understanding capacitors, since two oppositely charged metal disks or plates can create a nearly constant electric field between them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before we begin our calculations, take a look at this image of a uniformly charged disk:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_6.png|400px|thumb|Figure 1: diagram of a uniformly charged disk]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This image shows a visual representation of a disk. It should look pretty familiar. In fact, the shape of a disk is simply an extension of a [http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Charged_Ring ring]. Think of it as infinitely many uniformly charged rings. Thinking of a disk this way will help to understand the equation of the electric field for a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the equation for the electric field of a uniformly charged ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E= \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0}\frac{qz}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This equation will tell you the electric field of a uniformly charged ring at any observation location z. To apply this equation to a disk, integration will be involved. The integration variable in this case should be the radius of the ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as that will change with the infinitely many concentric rings you have. However, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is nowhere to be found in the equation. But if the radius of each ring is different, what gets affected as a result?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\&lt;br /&gt;
 dq = Q\frac{area of ring}{area of disk} = \frac{π((r+dr)^2-r^2)}{πR^2} = \frac{π(r^2 - r^2 +2r*dr+ dr^2)}{πR^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assume that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is essentially zero compared to the non-squared differential term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dq= Q\frac{2πrdr}{πr^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here you see that the charge of each ring is different due to the changing radius. The charge changes by a factor of the area of the ring, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πrdr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, (if you roll out the ring, it is a rectangle with height &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) divided by the area of the disk, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; πr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging that in for the q variable in our integration, and then cancelling out some variables, will allow us to solve for the electric field of a disk: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ dE = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}\frac{zrdr}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we take the integral of this equation, and the result is this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, we have the equation that finds us the exact electric potential of a uniformly charged disk. You can still make approximations to make the formula simpler, however. If your observation location z is very close to the disk but not touching it, and is also significantly smaller than the radius of the disk (i.e. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the equation becomes this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most commonly seen form of this equation, and becomes very important when applied to the case of capacitors. A key aspect of the field in these situations is the fact that it&#039;s constant in space between two charged plates. This unique aspect of capacitors, which does not occur for any other type of charged geometry, allows for several novel applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Another Mathematical Derivation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The previous section showed how to derive the formula for the electric field of a disk by setting dq as a ring. However, it is possible to arrive at the same formula by setting dq to be a square, with one side of length rdθ and the other side being of length dr. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.glowscript.org/#/user/vritpatel/folder/MyPrograms/program/Wiki Computational Code] confirms that this method of derivation returns the expected values, pointing in the correct, expected direction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method involves the computation of a double-integral. While it is significantly harder to derive the formula using this method (and isn&#039;t expected to be known in the scope of PHYS 2212), this method is still valid. This example is meant to show that in physics, there can be multiple avenues by which to solve the same exact problem, some easier than others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This derivation will account for the properties of the disk. For example, the derivation will show that the x and y-components of the Electrical field will go to 0, due to the symmetry of the charged disk. The direction of the electrical field will depend on the charge of the disk. The derivation of the magnitude of the Electrical field of a disk is shown below using this new method. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vrits2ndDerivation.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writers of the textbook Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition, have some great examples of VPython [http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/scripts/15_E_disk.py code] that show, in computational form, the electric field of a uniformly charged disk. To see the code in action, take a look at [https://trinket.io/glowscript/3088e75439 this] or copy the code into your VIDLE shell. Enjoy!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/7298995b3d04]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In what circumstance would you not use the approximate formula for calculating the electric field and have to use another formula?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_4.png|300px|thumb|Figure 2: Easy problem #1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This question is important, as this situation can come up a lot when solving physics problem. Remember that in the special case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you are allowed to use the approximate formula. But if that second condition, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is not true, then you must use the exact formula (listed above). Or, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you also must use the exact formula, as then the observation location is relatively far from the disk. So it is important to look at your &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; value when you decide which equation to use when finding the electric field of a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_3.png|300px|thumb|Figure 3: Middling problem #2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk, with it&#039;s center on the origin, and a of radius 0.4 m is uniformly charged with charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = -4 * 10^{-7} C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. What is the electric field of this disk at a location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0,0,0.04&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a a pretty simple problem, as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so you can use the approximate formula: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \ E = \frac{4 * 10^{-7}}{2\epsilon_0π*(0.4)^{2}} = 4.5 * 10^{4}   N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_2.png|300px|thumb|Figure 4: Difficult problem #3 diagram]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk located with a center at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m is uniformly charged with an excess of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;7.46 * 10^{-6} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons. Find the radius of the disk if it generates an electric field of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = 2.2 * 10^{3} N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we don&#039;t know the radius of the disk, we cannot be sure that using the approximation would be accurate, because we don&#039;t know if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We must use the full formula, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start by calculating Q, knowing that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = e * -1.602 * 10^{-19} = -1.2 * 10^{-6} C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, we find z, which is essentially the distance from the center of the disk to the observation point. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z = mag( &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; ) = 0.75 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, we use the original equation for electric field to solve for R. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 2.6 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m. If we solve it using the approximated formula,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We calculate &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 3.13 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which has a significant amount of error from the original formula calculation. This indicates that using the approximation in this scenario would not have been appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
Uniformly charged disks are a fundamental component to capacitors (which is two disks placed parallel to each other), which are found everywhere in physics courses as well as the real world. They are key parts of LC circuits, RC circuits, batteries, signal processing, and can even produce light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Television&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capacitors and charged plates used to play a heavy role in televisions! Charged plates were used to accelerate electrons, which were then manipulated and directed by magnetic fields to control what area of the television screen they would strike. As they hit the screen, a certain chemical would glow a specific color, generating an image. So every time you woke up early on saturday morning (before the advent of flat screen televisions), your episodes of Spongebob and Fairly OddParents was brought to you by capacitors!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Chemical Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric fields of capacitors may seem completely unrelated to chemical engineering. But actually, there are a surprising number of applications within chemical engineering. For example, much of the instrumentation used in chemical processes rely on capacitors and their ability to generate constant electric fields between two charged plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Industrial Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary careers in chemical engineering focuses on operating, maintaining, and optimizing a chemical plant or refinery. In a refinery, there are thousands of things you have to monitor throughout the plant. Every pipe and vessel holding liquid or gas is susceptible to corrosion, and any breach in containment could jeapordize thousands of lives. One of the most common causes of corrosion is ionic contaminants in water. Before a method was found to monitor and troubleshoot the ion concentrations in water, there were numerous dangerous corrosion events that put people&#039;s lives in danger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, we monitor the conductivity of water in a refinery. This is done using CAPACITORS. Essentially, capacitors are used to monitor the changing electric field and dielectric properties of the water running through it. This data is then analyzed to find the amount of ionic contaminant in the water, allowing the chemical engineer to prevent corrosion at the source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The first capacitor was invented in 1746. It was called the Leyden Jar, and it was essentially a glass jar wrapped in aluminum on both sides. They were used initially to store charge, almost as a battery. With the advent of radio technologies, capacitors played a key role in producing and receiving radio signals. Thus, they were heavily improved due to the demand from the radio industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dielectric_2.png|400px|center|thumb|Figure 5: a capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As technology progressed, capacitors were developed that were smaller and more compact, allowing broad uses and applications. These ranged from diverse circuits to incredibly powerful transmitters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.webassign.net/ebooks/mi4/toc.html? Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5UyXkFCg5s Video: Electric Field Due to a Charged Disk, Infinite Sheet of Charge, Parallel Plates - Physics Problems]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/phys208/exercises/kevan/efield1.html Solved problems for the electric field of a ring, disk, and plane]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/category/physics PhET Simulations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/index-e.html VPython Physics Programs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor Further Online Reading]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: all images were created by author&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:What category did you place this in?]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48015</id>
		<title>Charged Disk</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48015"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T00:48:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Spring 2026)&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a charged disk can be understood as the total electric field produced by all of the small pieces of charge on the disk. By using the Law of Superposition, we can treat the disk as many thin charged rings and add their electric field contributions together. Because the disk is symmetric, the sideways components of the electric field cancel along the central axis, leaving only a field in the z-direction. This idea is especially useful for understanding capacitors, since two oppositely charged metal disks or plates can create a nearly constant electric field between them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before we begin our calculations, take a look at this image of a uniformly charged disk:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_6.png|400px|thumb|Figure 1: diagram of a uniformly charged disk]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This image shows a visual representation of a disk. It should look pretty familiar. In fact, the shape of a disk is simply an extension of a [http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Charged_Ring ring]. Think of it as infinitely many uniformly charged rings. Thinking of a disk this way will help to understand the equation of the electric field for a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the equation for the electric field of a uniformly charged ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E= \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0}\frac{qz}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This equation will tell you the electric field of a uniformly charged ring at any observation location z. To apply this equation to a disk, integration will be involved. The integration variable in this case should be the radius of the ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as that will change with the infinitely many concentric rings you have. However, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is nowhere to be found in the equation. But if the radius of each ring is different, what gets affected as a result?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\&lt;br /&gt;
 dq = Q\frac{area of ring}{area of disk} = \frac{π((r+dr)^2-r^2)}{πR^2} = \frac{π(r^2 - r^2 +2r*dr+ dr^2)}{πR^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assume that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is essentially zero compared to the non-squared differential term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dq= Q\frac{2πrdr}{πr^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here you see that the charge of each ring is different due to the changing radius. The charge changes by a factor of the area of the ring, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πrdr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, (if you roll out the ring, it is a rectangle with height &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) divided by the area of the disk, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; πr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging that in for the q variable in our integration, and then cancelling out some variables, will allow us to solve for the electric field of a disk: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ dE = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}\frac{zrdr}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we take the integral of this equation, and the result is this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, we have the equation that finds us the exact electric potential of a uniformly charged disk. You can still make approximations to make the formula simpler, however. If your observation location z is very close to the disk but not touching it, and is also significantly smaller than the radius of the disk (i.e. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the equation becomes this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most commonly seen form of this equation, and becomes very important when applied to the case of capacitors. A key aspect of the field in these situations is the fact that it&#039;s constant in space between two charged plates. This unique aspect of capacitors, which does not occur for any other type of charged geometry, allows for several novel applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Another Mathematical Derivation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The previous section showed how to derive the formula for the electric field of a disk by setting dq as a ring. However, it is possible to arrive at the same formula by setting dq to be a square, with one side of length rdθ and the other side being of length dr. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.glowscript.org/#/user/vritpatel/folder/MyPrograms/program/Wiki Computational Code] confirms that this method of derivation returns the expected values, pointing in the correct, expected direction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method involves the computation of a double-integral. While it is significantly harder to derive the formula using this method (and isn&#039;t expected to be known in the scope of PHYS 2212), this method is still valid. This example is meant to show that in physics, there can be multiple avenues by which to solve the same exact problem, some easier than others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This derivation will account for the properties of the disk. For example, the derivation will show that the x and y-components of the Electrical field will go to 0, due to the symmetry of the charged disk. The direction of the electrical field will depend on the charge of the disk. The derivation of the magnitude of the Electrical field of a disk is shown below using this new method. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vrits2ndDerivation.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writers of the textbook Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition, have some great examples of VPython [http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/scripts/15_E_disk.py code] that show, in computational form, the electric field of a uniformly charged disk. To see the code in action, take a look at [https://trinket.io/glowscript/3088e75439 this] or copy the code into your VIDLE shell. Enjoy!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;html&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;iframe src=&amp;quot;https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/7298995b3d04&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;900&amp;quot; height=&amp;quot;750&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/iframe&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/html&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In what circumstance would you not use the approximate formula for calculating the electric field and have to use another formula?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_4.png|300px|thumb|Figure 2: Easy problem #1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This question is important, as this situation can come up a lot when solving physics problem. Remember that in the special case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you are allowed to use the approximate formula. But if that second condition, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is not true, then you must use the exact formula (listed above). Or, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you also must use the exact formula, as then the observation location is relatively far from the disk. So it is important to look at your &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; value when you decide which equation to use when finding the electric field of a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_3.png|300px|thumb|Figure 3: Middling problem #2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk, with it&#039;s center on the origin, and a of radius 0.4 m is uniformly charged with charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = -4 * 10^{-7} C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. What is the electric field of this disk at a location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0,0,0.04&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a a pretty simple problem, as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so you can use the approximate formula: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \ E = \frac{4 * 10^{-7}}{2\epsilon_0π*(0.4)^{2}} = 4.5 * 10^{4}   N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_2.png|300px|thumb|Figure 4: Difficult problem #3 diagram]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk located with a center at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m is uniformly charged with an excess of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;7.46 * 10^{-6} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons. Find the radius of the disk if it generates an electric field of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = 2.2 * 10^{3} N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we don&#039;t know the radius of the disk, we cannot be sure that using the approximation would be accurate, because we don&#039;t know if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We must use the full formula, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start by calculating Q, knowing that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = e * -1.602 * 10^{-19} = -1.2 * 10^{-6} C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, we find z, which is essentially the distance from the center of the disk to the observation point. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z = mag( &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; ) = 0.75 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, we use the original equation for electric field to solve for R. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 2.6 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m. If we solve it using the approximated formula,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We calculate &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 3.13 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which has a significant amount of error from the original formula calculation. This indicates that using the approximation in this scenario would not have been appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
Uniformly charged disks are a fundamental component to capacitors (which is two disks placed parallel to each other), which are found everywhere in physics courses as well as the real world. They are key parts of LC circuits, RC circuits, batteries, signal processing, and can even produce light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Television&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capacitors and charged plates used to play a heavy role in televisions! Charged plates were used to accelerate electrons, which were then manipulated and directed by magnetic fields to control what area of the television screen they would strike. As they hit the screen, a certain chemical would glow a specific color, generating an image. So every time you woke up early on saturday morning (before the advent of flat screen televisions), your episodes of Spongebob and Fairly OddParents was brought to you by capacitors!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Chemical Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric fields of capacitors may seem completely unrelated to chemical engineering. But actually, there are a surprising number of applications within chemical engineering. For example, much of the instrumentation used in chemical processes rely on capacitors and their ability to generate constant electric fields between two charged plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Industrial Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary careers in chemical engineering focuses on operating, maintaining, and optimizing a chemical plant or refinery. In a refinery, there are thousands of things you have to monitor throughout the plant. Every pipe and vessel holding liquid or gas is susceptible to corrosion, and any breach in containment could jeapordize thousands of lives. One of the most common causes of corrosion is ionic contaminants in water. Before a method was found to monitor and troubleshoot the ion concentrations in water, there were numerous dangerous corrosion events that put people&#039;s lives in danger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, we monitor the conductivity of water in a refinery. This is done using CAPACITORS. Essentially, capacitors are used to monitor the changing electric field and dielectric properties of the water running through it. This data is then analyzed to find the amount of ionic contaminant in the water, allowing the chemical engineer to prevent corrosion at the source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The first capacitor was invented in 1746. It was called the Leyden Jar, and it was essentially a glass jar wrapped in aluminum on both sides. They were used initially to store charge, almost as a battery. With the advent of radio technologies, capacitors played a key role in producing and receiving radio signals. Thus, they were heavily improved due to the demand from the radio industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dielectric_2.png|400px|center|thumb|Figure 5: a capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As technology progressed, capacitors were developed that were smaller and more compact, allowing broad uses and applications. These ranged from diverse circuits to incredibly powerful transmitters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.webassign.net/ebooks/mi4/toc.html? Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5UyXkFCg5s Video: Electric Field Due to a Charged Disk, Infinite Sheet of Charge, Parallel Plates - Physics Problems]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/phys208/exercises/kevan/efield1.html Solved problems for the electric field of a ring, disk, and plane]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/category/physics PhET Simulations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/index-e.html VPython Physics Programs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor Further Online Reading]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: all images were created by author&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:What category did you place this in?]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48014</id>
		<title>Charged Disk</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48014"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T00:46:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Spring 2026)&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a charged disk can be understood as the total electric field produced by all of the small pieces of charge on the disk. By using the Law of Superposition, we can treat the disk as many thin charged rings and add their electric field contributions together. Because the disk is symmetric, the sideways components of the electric field cancel along the central axis, leaving only a field in the z-direction. This idea is especially useful for understanding capacitors, since two oppositely charged metal disks or plates can create a nearly constant electric field between them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before we begin our calculations, take a look at this image of a uniformly charged disk:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_6.png|400px|thumb|Figure 1: diagram of a uniformly charged disk]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This image shows a visual representation of a disk. It should look pretty familiar. In fact, the shape of a disk is simply an extension of a [http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Charged_Ring ring]. Think of it as infinitely many uniformly charged rings. Thinking of a disk this way will help to understand the equation of the electric field for a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the equation for the electric field of a uniformly charged ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E= \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0}\frac{qz}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This equation will tell you the electric field of a uniformly charged ring at any observation location z. To apply this equation to a disk, integration will be involved. The integration variable in this case should be the radius of the ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as that will change with the infinitely many concentric rings you have. However, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is nowhere to be found in the equation. But if the radius of each ring is different, what gets affected as a result?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\&lt;br /&gt;
 dq = Q\frac{area of ring}{area of disk} = \frac{π((r+dr)^2-r^2)}{πR^2} = \frac{π(r^2 - r^2 +2r*dr+ dr^2)}{πR^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assume that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is essentially zero compared to the non-squared differential term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dq= Q\frac{2πrdr}{πr^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here you see that the charge of each ring is different due to the changing radius. The charge changes by a factor of the area of the ring, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πrdr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, (if you roll out the ring, it is a rectangle with height &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) divided by the area of the disk, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; πr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging that in for the q variable in our integration, and then cancelling out some variables, will allow us to solve for the electric field of a disk: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ dE = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}\frac{zrdr}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we take the integral of this equation, and the result is this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, we have the equation that finds us the exact electric potential of a uniformly charged disk. You can still make approximations to make the formula simpler, however. If your observation location z is very close to the disk but not touching it, and is also significantly smaller than the radius of the disk (i.e. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the equation becomes this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most commonly seen form of this equation, and becomes very important when applied to the case of capacitors. A key aspect of the field in these situations is the fact that it&#039;s constant in space between two charged plates. This unique aspect of capacitors, which does not occur for any other type of charged geometry, allows for several novel applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Another Mathematical Derivation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The previous section showed how to derive the formula for the electric field of a disk by setting dq as a ring. However, it is possible to arrive at the same formula by setting dq to be a square, with one side of length rdθ and the other side being of length dr. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.glowscript.org/#/user/vritpatel/folder/MyPrograms/program/Wiki Computational Code] confirms that this method of derivation returns the expected values, pointing in the correct, expected direction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method involves the computation of a double-integral. While it is significantly harder to derive the formula using this method (and isn&#039;t expected to be known in the scope of PHYS 2212), this method is still valid. This example is meant to show that in physics, there can be multiple avenues by which to solve the same exact problem, some easier than others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This derivation will account for the properties of the disk. For example, the derivation will show that the x and y-components of the Electrical field will go to 0, due to the symmetry of the charged disk. The direction of the electrical field will depend on the charge of the disk. The derivation of the magnitude of the Electrical field of a disk is shown below using this new method. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vrits2ndDerivation.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writers of the textbook Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition, have some great examples of VPython [http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/scripts/15_E_disk.py code] that show, in computational form, the electric field of a uniformly charged disk. To see the code in action, take a look at [https://trinket.io/glowscript/3088e75439 this] or copy the code into your VIDLE shell. Enjoy!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;iframe src=&amp;quot;https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/7298995b3d04&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;900&amp;quot; height=&amp;quot;750&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/iframe&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In what circumstance would you not use the approximate formula for calculating the electric field and have to use another formula?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_4.png|300px|thumb|Figure 2: Easy problem #1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This question is important, as this situation can come up a lot when solving physics problem. Remember that in the special case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you are allowed to use the approximate formula. But if that second condition, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is not true, then you must use the exact formula (listed above). Or, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you also must use the exact formula, as then the observation location is relatively far from the disk. So it is important to look at your &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; value when you decide which equation to use when finding the electric field of a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_3.png|300px|thumb|Figure 3: Middling problem #2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk, with it&#039;s center on the origin, and a of radius 0.4 m is uniformly charged with charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = -4 * 10^{-7} C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. What is the electric field of this disk at a location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0,0,0.04&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a a pretty simple problem, as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so you can use the approximate formula: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \ E = \frac{4 * 10^{-7}}{2\epsilon_0π*(0.4)^{2}} = 4.5 * 10^{4}   N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_2.png|300px|thumb|Figure 4: Difficult problem #3 diagram]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk located with a center at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m is uniformly charged with an excess of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;7.46 * 10^{-6} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons. Find the radius of the disk if it generates an electric field of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = 2.2 * 10^{3} N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we don&#039;t know the radius of the disk, we cannot be sure that using the approximation would be accurate, because we don&#039;t know if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We must use the full formula, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start by calculating Q, knowing that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = e * -1.602 * 10^{-19} = -1.2 * 10^{-6} C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, we find z, which is essentially the distance from the center of the disk to the observation point. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z = mag( &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; ) = 0.75 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, we use the original equation for electric field to solve for R. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 2.6 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m. If we solve it using the approximated formula,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We calculate &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 3.13 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which has a significant amount of error from the original formula calculation. This indicates that using the approximation in this scenario would not have been appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
Uniformly charged disks are a fundamental component to capacitors (which is two disks placed parallel to each other), which are found everywhere in physics courses as well as the real world. They are key parts of LC circuits, RC circuits, batteries, signal processing, and can even produce light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Television&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capacitors and charged plates used to play a heavy role in televisions! Charged plates were used to accelerate electrons, which were then manipulated and directed by magnetic fields to control what area of the television screen they would strike. As they hit the screen, a certain chemical would glow a specific color, generating an image. So every time you woke up early on saturday morning (before the advent of flat screen televisions), your episodes of Spongebob and Fairly OddParents was brought to you by capacitors!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Chemical Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric fields of capacitors may seem completely unrelated to chemical engineering. But actually, there are a surprising number of applications within chemical engineering. For example, much of the instrumentation used in chemical processes rely on capacitors and their ability to generate constant electric fields between two charged plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Industrial Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary careers in chemical engineering focuses on operating, maintaining, and optimizing a chemical plant or refinery. In a refinery, there are thousands of things you have to monitor throughout the plant. Every pipe and vessel holding liquid or gas is susceptible to corrosion, and any breach in containment could jeapordize thousands of lives. One of the most common causes of corrosion is ionic contaminants in water. Before a method was found to monitor and troubleshoot the ion concentrations in water, there were numerous dangerous corrosion events that put people&#039;s lives in danger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, we monitor the conductivity of water in a refinery. This is done using CAPACITORS. Essentially, capacitors are used to monitor the changing electric field and dielectric properties of the water running through it. This data is then analyzed to find the amount of ionic contaminant in the water, allowing the chemical engineer to prevent corrosion at the source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The first capacitor was invented in 1746. It was called the Leyden Jar, and it was essentially a glass jar wrapped in aluminum on both sides. They were used initially to store charge, almost as a battery. With the advent of radio technologies, capacitors played a key role in producing and receiving radio signals. Thus, they were heavily improved due to the demand from the radio industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dielectric_2.png|400px|center|thumb|Figure 5: a capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As technology progressed, capacitors were developed that were smaller and more compact, allowing broad uses and applications. These ranged from diverse circuits to incredibly powerful transmitters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.webassign.net/ebooks/mi4/toc.html? Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5UyXkFCg5s Video: Electric Field Due to a Charged Disk, Infinite Sheet of Charge, Parallel Plates - Physics Problems]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/phys208/exercises/kevan/efield1.html Solved problems for the electric field of a ring, disk, and plane]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/category/physics PhET Simulations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/index-e.html VPython Physics Programs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor Further Online Reading]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: all images were created by author&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:What category did you place this in?]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48013</id>
		<title>Charged Disk</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48013"/>
		<updated>2026-04-26T00:45:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Spring 2026)&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a charged disk can be understood as the total electric field produced by all of the small pieces of charge on the disk. By using the Law of Superposition, we can treat the disk as many thin charged rings and add their electric field contributions together. Because the disk is symmetric, the sideways components of the electric field cancel along the central axis, leaving only a field in the z-direction. This idea is especially useful for understanding capacitors, since two oppositely charged metal disks or plates can create a nearly constant electric field between them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before we begin our calculations, take a look at this image of a uniformly charged disk:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_6.png|400px|thumb|Figure 1: diagram of a uniformly charged disk]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This image shows a visual representation of a disk. It should look pretty familiar. In fact, the shape of a disk is simply an extension of a [http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Charged_Ring ring]. Think of it as infinitely many uniformly charged rings. Thinking of a disk this way will help to understand the equation of the electric field for a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the equation for the electric field of a uniformly charged ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E= \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0}\frac{qz}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This equation will tell you the electric field of a uniformly charged ring at any observation location z. To apply this equation to a disk, integration will be involved. The integration variable in this case should be the radius of the ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as that will change with the infinitely many concentric rings you have. However, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is nowhere to be found in the equation. But if the radius of each ring is different, what gets affected as a result?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\&lt;br /&gt;
 dq = Q\frac{area of ring}{area of disk} = \frac{π((r+dr)^2-r^2)}{πR^2} = \frac{π(r^2 - r^2 +2r*dr+ dr^2)}{πR^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assume that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is essentially zero compared to the non-squared differential term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dq= Q\frac{2πrdr}{πr^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here you see that the charge of each ring is different due to the changing radius. The charge changes by a factor of the area of the ring, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πrdr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, (if you roll out the ring, it is a rectangle with height &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) divided by the area of the disk, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; πr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging that in for the q variable in our integration, and then cancelling out some variables, will allow us to solve for the electric field of a disk: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ dE = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}\frac{zrdr}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we take the integral of this equation, and the result is this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, we have the equation that finds us the exact electric potential of a uniformly charged disk. You can still make approximations to make the formula simpler, however. If your observation location z is very close to the disk but not touching it, and is also significantly smaller than the radius of the disk (i.e. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the equation becomes this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most commonly seen form of this equation, and becomes very important when applied to the case of capacitors. A key aspect of the field in these situations is the fact that it&#039;s constant in space between two charged plates. This unique aspect of capacitors, which does not occur for any other type of charged geometry, allows for several novel applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Another Mathematical Derivation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The previous section showed how to derive the formula for the electric field of a disk by setting dq as a ring. However, it is possible to arrive at the same formula by setting dq to be a square, with one side of length rdθ and the other side being of length dr. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.glowscript.org/#/user/vritpatel/folder/MyPrograms/program/Wiki Computational Code] confirms that this method of derivation returns the expected values, pointing in the correct, expected direction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method involves the computation of a double-integral. While it is significantly harder to derive the formula using this method (and isn&#039;t expected to be known in the scope of PHYS 2212), this method is still valid. This example is meant to show that in physics, there can be multiple avenues by which to solve the same exact problem, some easier than others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This derivation will account for the properties of the disk. For example, the derivation will show that the x and y-components of the Electrical field will go to 0, due to the symmetry of the charged disk. The direction of the electrical field will depend on the charge of the disk. The derivation of the magnitude of the Electrical field of a disk is shown below using this new method. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vrits2ndDerivation.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writers of the textbook Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition, have some great examples of VPython [http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/scripts/15_E_disk.py code] that show, in computational form, the electric field of a uniformly charged disk. To see the code in action, take a look at [https://trinket.io/glowscript/3088e75439 this] or copy the code into your VIDLE shell. Enjoy!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;iframe src=&amp;quot;https://trinket.io/embed/glowscript/7298995b3d04&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot; height=&amp;quot;356&amp;quot; frameborder=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; marginwidth=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; marginheight=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; allowfullscreen&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/iframe&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In what circumstance would you not use the approximate formula for calculating the electric field and have to use another formula?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_4.png|300px|thumb|Figure 2: Easy problem #1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This question is important, as this situation can come up a lot when solving physics problem. Remember that in the special case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you are allowed to use the approximate formula. But if that second condition, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is not true, then you must use the exact formula (listed above). Or, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you also must use the exact formula, as then the observation location is relatively far from the disk. So it is important to look at your &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; value when you decide which equation to use when finding the electric field of a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_3.png|300px|thumb|Figure 3: Middling problem #2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk, with it&#039;s center on the origin, and a of radius 0.4 m is uniformly charged with charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = -4 * 10^{-7} C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. What is the electric field of this disk at a location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0,0,0.04&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a a pretty simple problem, as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so you can use the approximate formula: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \ E = \frac{4 * 10^{-7}}{2\epsilon_0π*(0.4)^{2}} = 4.5 * 10^{4}   N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_2.png|300px|thumb|Figure 4: Difficult problem #3 diagram]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk located with a center at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m is uniformly charged with an excess of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;7.46 * 10^{-6} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons. Find the radius of the disk if it generates an electric field of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = 2.2 * 10^{3} N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we don&#039;t know the radius of the disk, we cannot be sure that using the approximation would be accurate, because we don&#039;t know if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We must use the full formula, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start by calculating Q, knowing that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = e * -1.602 * 10^{-19} = -1.2 * 10^{-6} C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, we find z, which is essentially the distance from the center of the disk to the observation point. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z = mag( &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; ) = 0.75 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, we use the original equation for electric field to solve for R. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 2.6 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m. If we solve it using the approximated formula,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We calculate &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 3.13 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which has a significant amount of error from the original formula calculation. This indicates that using the approximation in this scenario would not have been appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
Uniformly charged disks are a fundamental component to capacitors (which is two disks placed parallel to each other), which are found everywhere in physics courses as well as the real world. They are key parts of LC circuits, RC circuits, batteries, signal processing, and can even produce light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Television&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capacitors and charged plates used to play a heavy role in televisions! Charged plates were used to accelerate electrons, which were then manipulated and directed by magnetic fields to control what area of the television screen they would strike. As they hit the screen, a certain chemical would glow a specific color, generating an image. So every time you woke up early on saturday morning (before the advent of flat screen televisions), your episodes of Spongebob and Fairly OddParents was brought to you by capacitors!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Chemical Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric fields of capacitors may seem completely unrelated to chemical engineering. But actually, there are a surprising number of applications within chemical engineering. For example, much of the instrumentation used in chemical processes rely on capacitors and their ability to generate constant electric fields between two charged plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Industrial Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary careers in chemical engineering focuses on operating, maintaining, and optimizing a chemical plant or refinery. In a refinery, there are thousands of things you have to monitor throughout the plant. Every pipe and vessel holding liquid or gas is susceptible to corrosion, and any breach in containment could jeapordize thousands of lives. One of the most common causes of corrosion is ionic contaminants in water. Before a method was found to monitor and troubleshoot the ion concentrations in water, there were numerous dangerous corrosion events that put people&#039;s lives in danger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, we monitor the conductivity of water in a refinery. This is done using CAPACITORS. Essentially, capacitors are used to monitor the changing electric field and dielectric properties of the water running through it. This data is then analyzed to find the amount of ionic contaminant in the water, allowing the chemical engineer to prevent corrosion at the source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The first capacitor was invented in 1746. It was called the Leyden Jar, and it was essentially a glass jar wrapped in aluminum on both sides. They were used initially to store charge, almost as a battery. With the advent of radio technologies, capacitors played a key role in producing and receiving radio signals. Thus, they were heavily improved due to the demand from the radio industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dielectric_2.png|400px|center|thumb|Figure 5: a capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As technology progressed, capacitors were developed that were smaller and more compact, allowing broad uses and applications. These ranged from diverse circuits to incredibly powerful transmitters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.webassign.net/ebooks/mi4/toc.html? Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5UyXkFCg5s Video: Electric Field Due to a Charged Disk, Infinite Sheet of Charge, Parallel Plates - Physics Problems]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/phys208/exercises/kevan/efield1.html Solved problems for the electric field of a ring, disk, and plane]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/category/physics PhET Simulations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/index-e.html VPython Physics Programs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor Further Online Reading]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: all images were created by author&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:What category did you place this in?]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48012</id>
		<title>Charged Disk</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48012"/>
		<updated>2026-04-25T21:55:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Spring 2026)&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a charged disk can be understood as the total electric field produced by all of the small pieces of charge on the disk. By using the Law of Superposition, we can treat the disk as many thin charged rings and add their electric field contributions together. Because the disk is symmetric, the sideways components of the electric field cancel along the central axis, leaving only a field in the z-direction. This idea is especially useful for understanding capacitors, since two oppositely charged metal disks or plates can create a nearly constant electric field between them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before we begin our calculations, take a look at this image of a uniformly charged disk:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_6.png|400px|thumb|Figure 1: diagram of a uniformly charged disk]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This image shows a visual representation of a disk. It should look pretty familiar. In fact, the shape of a disk is simply an extension of a [http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Charged_Ring ring]. Think of it as infinitely many uniformly charged rings. Thinking of a disk this way will help to understand the equation of the electric field for a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the equation for the electric field of a uniformly charged ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E= \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0}\frac{qz}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This equation will tell you the electric field of a uniformly charged ring at any observation location z. To apply this equation to a disk, integration will be involved. The integration variable in this case should be the radius of the ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as that will change with the infinitely many concentric rings you have. However, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is nowhere to be found in the equation. But if the radius of each ring is different, what gets affected as a result?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\&lt;br /&gt;
 dq = Q\frac{area of ring}{area of disk} = \frac{π((r+dr)^2-r^2)}{πR^2} = \frac{π(r^2 - r^2 +2r*dr+ dr^2)}{πR^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assume that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is essentially zero compared to the non-squared differential term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dq= Q\frac{2πrdr}{πr^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here you see that the charge of each ring is different due to the changing radius. The charge changes by a factor of the area of the ring, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πrdr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, (if you roll out the ring, it is a rectangle with height &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) divided by the area of the disk, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; πr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging that in for the q variable in our integration, and then cancelling out some variables, will allow us to solve for the electric field of a disk: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ dE = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}\frac{zrdr}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we take the integral of this equation, and the result is this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, we have the equation that finds us the exact electric potential of a uniformly charged disk. You can still make approximations to make the formula simpler, however. If your observation location z is very close to the disk but not touching it, and is also significantly smaller than the radius of the disk (i.e. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the equation becomes this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most commonly seen form of this equation, and becomes very important when applied to the case of capacitors. A key aspect of the field in these situations is the fact that it&#039;s constant in space between two charged plates. This unique aspect of capacitors, which does not occur for any other type of charged geometry, allows for several novel applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Another Mathematical Derivation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The previous section showed how to derive the formula for the electric field of a disk by setting dq as a ring. However, it is possible to arrive at the same formula by setting dq to be a square, with one side of length rdθ and the other side being of length dr. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.glowscript.org/#/user/vritpatel/folder/MyPrograms/program/Wiki Computational Code] confirms that this method of derivation returns the expected values, pointing in the correct, expected direction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method involves the computation of a double-integral. While it is significantly harder to derive the formula using this method (and isn&#039;t expected to be known in the scope of PHYS 2212), this method is still valid. This example is meant to show that in physics, there can be multiple avenues by which to solve the same exact problem, some easier than others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This derivation will account for the properties of the disk. For example, the derivation will show that the x and y-components of the Electrical field will go to 0, due to the symmetry of the charged disk. The direction of the electrical field will depend on the charge of the disk. The derivation of the magnitude of the Electrical field of a disk is shown below using this new method. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vrits2ndDerivation.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writers of the textbook Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition, have some great examples of VPython [http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/scripts/15_E_disk.py code] that show, in computational form, the electric field of a uniformly charged disk. To see the code in action, take a look at [https://trinket.io/glowscript/3088e75439 this] or copy the code into your VIDLE shell. Enjoy!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also took a look at [https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/legacy/capacitor-lab this] java applet for a lab simulation of a capacitor&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In what circumstance would you not use the approximate formula for calculating the electric field and have to use another formula?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_4.png|300px|thumb|Figure 2: Easy problem #1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This question is important, as this situation can come up a lot when solving physics problem. Remember that in the special case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you are allowed to use the approximate formula. But if that second condition, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is not true, then you must use the exact formula (listed above). Or, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you also must use the exact formula, as then the observation location is relatively far from the disk. So it is important to look at your &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; value when you decide which equation to use when finding the electric field of a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_3.png|300px|thumb|Figure 3: Middling problem #2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk, with it&#039;s center on the origin, and a of radius 0.4 m is uniformly charged with charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = -4 * 10^{-7} C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. What is the electric field of this disk at a location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0,0,0.04&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a a pretty simple problem, as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so you can use the approximate formula: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \ E = \frac{4 * 10^{-7}}{2\epsilon_0π*(0.4)^{2}} = 4.5 * 10^{4}   N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_2.png|300px|thumb|Figure 4: Difficult problem #3 diagram]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk located with a center at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m is uniformly charged with an excess of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;7.46 * 10^{-6} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons. Find the radius of the disk if it generates an electric field of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = 2.2 * 10^{3} N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we don&#039;t know the radius of the disk, we cannot be sure that using the approximation would be accurate, because we don&#039;t know if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We must use the full formula, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start by calculating Q, knowing that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = e * -1.602 * 10^{-19} = -1.2 * 10^{-6} C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, we find z, which is essentially the distance from the center of the disk to the observation point. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z = mag( &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; ) = 0.75 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, we use the original equation for electric field to solve for R. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 2.6 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m. If we solve it using the approximated formula,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We calculate &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 3.13 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which has a significant amount of error from the original formula calculation. This indicates that using the approximation in this scenario would not have been appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
Uniformly charged disks are a fundamental component to capacitors (which is two disks placed parallel to each other), which are found everywhere in physics courses as well as the real world. They are key parts of LC circuits, RC circuits, batteries, signal processing, and can even produce light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Television&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capacitors and charged plates used to play a heavy role in televisions! Charged plates were used to accelerate electrons, which were then manipulated and directed by magnetic fields to control what area of the television screen they would strike. As they hit the screen, a certain chemical would glow a specific color, generating an image. So every time you woke up early on saturday morning (before the advent of flat screen televisions), your episodes of Spongebob and Fairly OddParents was brought to you by capacitors!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Chemical Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric fields of capacitors may seem completely unrelated to chemical engineering. But actually, there are a surprising number of applications within chemical engineering. For example, much of the instrumentation used in chemical processes rely on capacitors and their ability to generate constant electric fields between two charged plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Industrial Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary careers in chemical engineering focuses on operating, maintaining, and optimizing a chemical plant or refinery. In a refinery, there are thousands of things you have to monitor throughout the plant. Every pipe and vessel holding liquid or gas is susceptible to corrosion, and any breach in containment could jeapordize thousands of lives. One of the most common causes of corrosion is ionic contaminants in water. Before a method was found to monitor and troubleshoot the ion concentrations in water, there were numerous dangerous corrosion events that put people&#039;s lives in danger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, we monitor the conductivity of water in a refinery. This is done using CAPACITORS. Essentially, capacitors are used to monitor the changing electric field and dielectric properties of the water running through it. This data is then analyzed to find the amount of ionic contaminant in the water, allowing the chemical engineer to prevent corrosion at the source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The first capacitor was invented in 1746. It was called the Leyden Jar, and it was essentially a glass jar wrapped in aluminum on both sides. They were used initially to store charge, almost as a battery. With the advent of radio technologies, capacitors played a key role in producing and receiving radio signals. Thus, they were heavily improved due to the demand from the radio industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dielectric_2.png|400px|center|thumb|Figure 5: a capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As technology progressed, capacitors were developed that were smaller and more compact, allowing broad uses and applications. These ranged from diverse circuits to incredibly powerful transmitters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.webassign.net/ebooks/mi4/toc.html? Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5UyXkFCg5s Video: Electric Field Due to a Charged Disk, Infinite Sheet of Charge, Parallel Plates - Physics Problems]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/phys208/exercises/kevan/efield1.html Solved problems for the electric field of a ring, disk, and plane]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/category/physics PhET Simulations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/index-e.html VPython Physics Programs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor Further Online Reading]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: all images were created by author&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:What category did you place this in?]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48011</id>
		<title>Charged Disk</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=48011"/>
		<updated>2026-04-25T21:33:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Spring 2026)&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a charged disk can be imagined as the total electric field  produced from each point on the disk. We can relate this the the Law of Superposition, but considering the disk as a collection of rings, which will lead to a better understanding of the electric feild produced by the disk. This is especially important because two oppositely charged metal disks collectively are known as a [[capacitor]], a concept seen in several places in physics and the real world. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before we begin our calculations, take a look at this image of a uniformly charged disk:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_6.png|400px|thumb|Figure 1: diagram of a uniformly charged disk]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This image shows a visual representation of a disk. It should look pretty familiar. In fact, the shape of a disk is simply an extension of a [http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Charged_Ring ring]. Think of it as infinitely many uniformly charged rings. Thinking of a disk this way will help to understand the equation of the electric field for a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the equation for the electric field of a uniformly charged ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E= \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0}\frac{qz}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This equation will tell you the electric field of a uniformly charged ring at any observation location z. To apply this equation to a disk, integration will be involved. The integration variable in this case should be the radius of the ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as that will change with the infinitely many concentric rings you have. However, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is nowhere to be found in the equation. But if the radius of each ring is different, what gets affected as a result?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\&lt;br /&gt;
 dq = Q\frac{area of ring}{area of disk} = \frac{π((r+dr)^2-r^2)}{πR^2} = \frac{π(r^2 - r^2 +2r*dr+ dr^2)}{πR^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assume that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is essentially zero compared to the non-squared differential term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dq= Q\frac{2πrdr}{πr^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here you see that the charge of each ring is different due to the changing radius. The charge changes by a factor of the area of the ring, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πrdr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, (if you roll out the ring, it is a rectangle with height &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) divided by the area of the disk, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; πr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging that in for the q variable in our integration, and then cancelling out some variables, will allow us to solve for the electric field of a disk: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ dE = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}\frac{zrdr}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we take the integral of this equation, and the result is this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, we have the equation that finds us the exact electric potential of a uniformly charged disk. You can still make approximations to make the formula simpler, however. If your observation location z is very close to the disk but not touching it, and is also significantly smaller than the radius of the disk (i.e. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the equation becomes this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most commonly seen form of this equation, and becomes very important when applied to the case of capacitors. A key aspect of the field in these situations is the fact that it&#039;s constant in space between two charged plates. This unique aspect of capacitors, which does not occur for any other type of charged geometry, allows for several novel applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Another Mathematical Derivation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The previous section showed how to derive the formula for the electric field of a disk by setting dq as a ring. However, it is possible to arrive at the same formula by setting dq to be a square, with one side of length rdθ and the other side being of length dr. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.glowscript.org/#/user/vritpatel/folder/MyPrograms/program/Wiki Computational Code] confirms that this method of derivation returns the expected values, pointing in the correct, expected direction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method involves the computation of a double-integral. While it is significantly harder to derive the formula using this method (and isn&#039;t expected to be known in the scope of PHYS 2212), this method is still valid. This example is meant to show that in physics, there can be multiple avenues by which to solve the same exact problem, some easier than others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This derivation will account for the properties of the disk. For example, the derivation will show that the x and y-components of the Electrical field will go to 0, due to the symmetry of the charged disk. The direction of the electrical field will depend on the charge of the disk. The derivation of the magnitude of the Electrical field of a disk is shown below using this new method. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vrits2ndDerivation.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writers of the textbook Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition, have some great examples of VPython [http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/scripts/15_E_disk.py code] that show, in computational form, the electric field of a uniformly charged disk. To see the code in action, take a look at [https://trinket.io/glowscript/3088e75439 this] or copy the code into your VIDLE shell. Enjoy!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also took a look at [https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/legacy/capacitor-lab this] java applet for a lab simulation of a capacitor&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In what circumstance would you not use the approximate formula for calculating the electric field and have to use another formula?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_4.png|300px|thumb|Figure 2: Easy problem #1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This question is important, as this situation can come up a lot when solving physics problem. Remember that in the special case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you are allowed to use the approximate formula. But if that second condition, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is not true, then you must use the exact formula (listed above). Or, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you also must use the exact formula, as then the observation location is relatively far from the disk. So it is important to look at your &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; value when you decide which equation to use when finding the electric field of a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_3.png|300px|thumb|Figure 3: Middling problem #2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk, with it&#039;s center on the origin, and a of radius 0.4 m is uniformly charged with charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = -4 * 10^{-7} C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. What is the electric field of this disk at a location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0,0,0.04&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a a pretty simple problem, as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so you can use the approximate formula: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \ E = \frac{4 * 10^{-7}}{2\epsilon_0π*(0.4)^{2}} = 4.5 * 10^{4}   N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_2.png|300px|thumb|Figure 4: Difficult problem #3 diagram]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk located with a center at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m is uniformly charged with an excess of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;7.46 * 10^{-6} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons. Find the radius of the disk if it generates an electric field of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = 2.2 * 10^{3} N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we don&#039;t know the radius of the disk, we cannot be sure that using the approximation would be accurate, because we don&#039;t know if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We must use the full formula, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start by calculating Q, knowing that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = e * -1.602 * 10^{-19} = -1.2 * 10^{-6} C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, we find z, which is essentially the distance from the center of the disk to the observation point. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z = mag( &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; ) = 0.75 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, we use the original equation for electric field to solve for R. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 2.6 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m. If we solve it using the approximated formula,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We calculate &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 3.13 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which has a significant amount of error from the original formula calculation. This indicates that using the approximation in this scenario would not have been appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
Uniformly charged disks are a fundamental component to capacitors (which is two disks placed parallel to each other), which are found everywhere in physics courses as well as the real world. They are key parts of LC circuits, RC circuits, batteries, signal processing, and can even produce light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Television&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capacitors and charged plates used to play a heavy role in televisions! Charged plates were used to accelerate electrons, which were then manipulated and directed by magnetic fields to control what area of the television screen they would strike. As they hit the screen, a certain chemical would glow a specific color, generating an image. So every time you woke up early on saturday morning (before the advent of flat screen televisions), your episodes of Spongebob and Fairly OddParents was brought to you by capacitors!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Chemical Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric fields of capacitors may seem completely unrelated to chemical engineering. But actually, there are a surprising number of applications within chemical engineering. For example, much of the instrumentation used in chemical processes rely on capacitors and their ability to generate constant electric fields between two charged plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Industrial Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary careers in chemical engineering focuses on operating, maintaining, and optimizing a chemical plant or refinery. In a refinery, there are thousands of things you have to monitor throughout the plant. Every pipe and vessel holding liquid or gas is susceptible to corrosion, and any breach in containment could jeapordize thousands of lives. One of the most common causes of corrosion is ionic contaminants in water. Before a method was found to monitor and troubleshoot the ion concentrations in water, there were numerous dangerous corrosion events that put people&#039;s lives in danger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, we monitor the conductivity of water in a refinery. This is done using CAPACITORS. Essentially, capacitors are used to monitor the changing electric field and dielectric properties of the water running through it. This data is then analyzed to find the amount of ionic contaminant in the water, allowing the chemical engineer to prevent corrosion at the source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The first capacitor was invented in 1746. It was called the Leyden Jar, and it was essentially a glass jar wrapped in aluminum on both sides. They were used initially to store charge, almost as a battery. With the advent of radio technologies, capacitors played a key role in producing and receiving radio signals. Thus, they were heavily improved due to the demand from the radio industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dielectric_2.png|400px|center|thumb|Figure 5: a capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As technology progressed, capacitors were developed that were smaller and more compact, allowing broad uses and applications. These ranged from diverse circuits to incredibly powerful transmitters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.webassign.net/ebooks/mi4/toc.html? Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5UyXkFCg5s Video: Electric Field Due to a Charged Disk, Infinite Sheet of Charge, Parallel Plates - Physics Problems]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/phys208/exercises/kevan/efield1.html Solved problems for the electric field of a ring, disk, and plane]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/category/physics PhET Simulations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/index-e.html VPython Physics Programs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor Further Online Reading]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: all images were created by author&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:What category did you place this in?]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=47990</id>
		<title>Charged Disk</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=47990"/>
		<updated>2026-04-25T19:44:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Spring 2026)&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a charged disk can be imagined as the total electric field  produced from each point on the disk. We can relate this the the Law of Superposition, but considering the disk as a collection of rings, which will lead to a better understanding of the electric feild produced by the disk. This is especially important because two oppositely charged metal disks collectively are known as a [[capacitor]], a concept seen in several places in physics and the real world. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before we begin our calculations, take a look at this image of a uniformly charged disk:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_6.png|400px|thumb|Figure 1: diagram of a uniformly charged disk]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This image shows a visual representation of a disk. It should look pretty familiar. In fact, the shape of a disk is simply an extension of a [http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Charged_Ring ring]. Think of it as infinitely many uniformly charged rings. Thinking of a disk this way will help to understand the equation of the electric field for a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the equation for the electric field of a uniformly charged ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E= \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0}\frac{qz}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This equation will tell you the electric field of a uniformly charged ring at any observation location z. To apply this equation to a disk, integration will be involved. The integration variable in this case should be the radius of the ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as that will change with the infinitely many concentric rings you have. However, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is nowhere to be found in the equation. But if the radius of each ring is different, what gets affected as a result?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\&lt;br /&gt;
 dq = Q\frac{area of ring}{area of disk} = \frac{π((r+dr)^2-r^2)}{πR^2} = \frac{π(r^2 - r^2 +2r*dr+ dr^2)}{πR^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assume that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is essentially zero compared to the non-squared differential term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dq= Q\frac{2πrdr}{πr^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here you see that the charge of each ring is different due to the changing radius. The charge changes by a factor of the area of the ring, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πrdr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, (if you roll out the ring, it is a rectangle with height &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) divided by the area of the disk, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; πr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging that in for the q variable in our integration, and then cancelling out some variables, will allow us to solve for the electric field of a disk: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ dE = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}\frac{zrdr}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we take the integral of this equation, and the result is this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, we have the equation that finds us the exact electric potential of a uniformly charged disk. You can still make approximations to make the formula simpler, however. If your observation location z is very close to the disk but not touching it, and is also significantly smaller than the radius of the disk (i.e. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the equation becomes this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most commonly seen form of this equation, and becomes very important when applied to the case of capacitors. A key aspect of the field in these situations is the fact that it&#039;s constant in space between two charged plates. This unique aspect of capacitors, which does not occur for any other type of charged geometry, allows for several novel applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Another Mathematical Derivation===&lt;br /&gt;
====CLAIMED BY VRIT PATEL SPRING 2024====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The previous section showed how to derive the formula for the electric field of a disk by setting dq as a ring. However, it is possible to arrive at the same formula by setting dq to be a square, with one side of length rdθ and the other side being of length dr. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.glowscript.org/#/user/vritpatel/folder/MyPrograms/program/Wiki Computational Code] confirms that this method of derivation returns the expected values, pointing in the correct, expected direction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method involves the computation of a double-integral. While it is significantly harder to derive the formula using this method (and isn&#039;t expected to be known in the scope of PHYS 2212), this method is still valid. This example is meant to show that in physics, there can be multiple avenues by which to solve the same exact problem, some easier than others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This derivation will account for the properties of the disk. For example, the derivation will show that the x and y-components of the Electrical field will go to 0, due to the symmetry of the charged disk. The direction of the electrical field will depend on the charge of the disk. The derivation of the magnitude of the Electrical field of a disk is shown below using this new method. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vrits2ndDerivation.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writers of the textbook Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition, have some great examples of VPython [http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/scripts/15_E_disk.py code] that show, in computational form, the electric field of a uniformly charged disk. To see the code in action, take a look at [https://trinket.io/glowscript/3088e75439 this] or copy the code into your VIDLE shell. Enjoy!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also took a look at [https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/legacy/capacitor-lab this] java applet for a lab simulation of a capacitor&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In what circumstance would you not use the approximate formula for calculating the electric field and have to use another formula?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_4.png|300px|thumb|Figure 2: Easy problem #1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This question is important, as this situation can come up a lot when solving physics problem. Remember that in the special case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you are allowed to use the approximate formula. But if that second condition, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is not true, then you must use the exact formula (listed above). Or, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you also must use the exact formula, as then the observation location is relatively far from the disk. So it is important to look at your &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; value when you decide which equation to use when finding the electric field of a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_3.png|300px|thumb|Figure 3: Middling problem #2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk, with it&#039;s center on the origin, and a of radius 0.4 m is uniformly charged with charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = -4 * 10^{-7} C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. What is the electric field of this disk at a location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0,0,0.04&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a a pretty simple problem, as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so you can use the approximate formula: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \ E = \frac{4 * 10^{-7}}{2\epsilon_0π*(0.4)^{2}} = 4.5 * 10^{4}   N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_2.png|300px|thumb|Figure 4: Difficult problem #3 diagram]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk located with a center at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m is uniformly charged with an excess of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;7.46 * 10^{-6} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons. Find the radius of the disk if it generates an electric field of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = 2.2 * 10^{3} N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we don&#039;t know the radius of the disk, we cannot be sure that using the approximation would be accurate, because we don&#039;t know if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We must use the full formula, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start by calculating Q, knowing that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = e * -1.602 * 10^{-19} = -1.2 * 10^{-6} C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, we find z, which is essentially the distance from the center of the disk to the observation point. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z = mag( &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; ) = 0.75 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, we use the original equation for electric field to solve for R. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 2.6 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m. If we solve it using the approximated formula,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We calculate &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 3.13 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which has a significant amount of error from the original formula calculation. This indicates that using the approximation in this scenario would not have been appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
Uniformly charged disks are a fundamental component to capacitors (which is two disks placed parallel to each other), which are found everywhere in physics courses as well as the real world. They are key parts of LC circuits, RC circuits, batteries, signal processing, and can even produce light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Television&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capacitors and charged plates used to play a heavy role in televisions! Charged plates were used to accelerate electrons, which were then manipulated and directed by magnetic fields to control what area of the television screen they would strike. As they hit the screen, a certain chemical would glow a specific color, generating an image. So every time you woke up early on saturday morning (before the advent of flat screen televisions), your episodes of Spongebob and Fairly OddParents was brought to you by capacitors!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Chemical Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric fields of capacitors may seem completely unrelated to chemical engineering. But actually, there are a surprising number of applications within chemical engineering. For example, much of the instrumentation used in chemical processes rely on capacitors and their ability to generate constant electric fields between two charged plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Industrial Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary careers in chemical engineering focuses on operating, maintaining, and optimizing a chemical plant or refinery. In a refinery, there are thousands of things you have to monitor throughout the plant. Every pipe and vessel holding liquid or gas is susceptible to corrosion, and any breach in containment could jeapordize thousands of lives. One of the most common causes of corrosion is ionic contaminants in water. Before a method was found to monitor and troubleshoot the ion concentrations in water, there were numerous dangerous corrosion events that put people&#039;s lives in danger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, we monitor the conductivity of water in a refinery. This is done using CAPACITORS. Essentially, capacitors are used to monitor the changing electric field and dielectric properties of the water running through it. This data is then analyzed to find the amount of ionic contaminant in the water, allowing the chemical engineer to prevent corrosion at the source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The first capacitor was invented in 1746. It was called the Leyden Jar, and it was essentially a glass jar wrapped in aluminum on both sides. They were used initially to store charge, almost as a battery. With the advent of radio technologies, capacitors played a key role in producing and receiving radio signals. Thus, they were heavily improved due to the demand from the radio industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dielectric_2.png|400px|center|thumb|Figure 5: a capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As technology progressed, capacitors were developed that were smaller and more compact, allowing broad uses and applications. These ranged from diverse circuits to incredibly powerful transmitters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.webassign.net/ebooks/mi4/toc.html? Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5UyXkFCg5s Video: Electric Field Due to a Charged Disk, Infinite Sheet of Charge, Parallel Plates - Physics Problems]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/phys208/exercises/kevan/efield1.html Solved problems for the electric field of a ring, disk, and plane]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/category/physics PhET Simulations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/index-e.html VPython Physics Programs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor Further Online Reading]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: all images were created by author&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:What category did you place this in?]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=47989</id>
		<title>Charged Disk</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Charged_Disk&amp;diff=47989"/>
		<updated>2026-04-25T19:43:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Spring 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric field of a charged disk can be imagined as the total electric field  produced from each point on the disk. We can relate this the the Law of Superposition, but considering the disk as a collection of rings, which will lead to a better understanding of the electric feild produced by the disk. This is especially important because two oppositely charged metal disks collectively are known as a [[capacitor]], a concept seen in several places in physics and the real world. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before we begin our calculations, take a look at this image of a uniformly charged disk:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_6.png|400px|thumb|Figure 1: diagram of a uniformly charged disk]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This image shows a visual representation of a disk. It should look pretty familiar. In fact, the shape of a disk is simply an extension of a [http://physicsbook.gatech.edu/Charged_Ring ring]. Think of it as infinitely many uniformly charged rings. Thinking of a disk this way will help to understand the equation of the electric field for a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall the equation for the electric field of a uniformly charged ring:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E= \frac{1}{4π\epsilon_0}\frac{qz}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This equation will tell you the electric field of a uniformly charged ring at any observation location z. To apply this equation to a disk, integration will be involved. The integration variable in this case should be the radius of the ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, as that will change with the infinitely many concentric rings you have. However, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; r &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is nowhere to be found in the equation. But if the radius of each ring is different, what gets affected as a result?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\&lt;br /&gt;
 dq = Q\frac{area of ring}{area of disk} = \frac{π((r+dr)^2-r^2)}{πR^2} = \frac{π(r^2 - r^2 +2r*dr+ dr^2)}{πR^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We assume that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is essentially zero compared to the non-squared differential term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dq= Q\frac{2πrdr}{πr^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here you see that the charge of each ring is different due to the changing radius. The charge changes by a factor of the area of the ring, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πrdr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, (if you roll out the ring, it is a rectangle with height &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; dr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and width &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 2πr &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) divided by the area of the disk, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; πr^2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging that in for the q variable in our integration, and then cancelling out some variables, will allow us to solve for the electric field of a disk: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ dE = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}\frac{zrdr}{(R^2+z^2)^{3/2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we take the integral of this equation, and the result is this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, we have the equation that finds us the exact electric potential of a uniformly charged disk. You can still make approximations to make the formula simpler, however. If your observation location z is very close to the disk but not touching it, and is also significantly smaller than the radius of the disk (i.e. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;), the equation becomes this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\ E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most commonly seen form of this equation, and becomes very important when applied to the case of capacitors. A key aspect of the field in these situations is the fact that it&#039;s constant in space between two charged plates. This unique aspect of capacitors, which does not occur for any other type of charged geometry, allows for several novel applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Another Mathematical Derivation===&lt;br /&gt;
====CLAIMED BY VRIT PATEL SPRING 2024====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The previous section showed how to derive the formula for the electric field of a disk by setting dq as a ring. However, it is possible to arrive at the same formula by setting dq to be a square, with one side of length rdθ and the other side being of length dr. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.glowscript.org/#/user/vritpatel/folder/MyPrograms/program/Wiki Computational Code] confirms that this method of derivation returns the expected values, pointing in the correct, expected direction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This method involves the computation of a double-integral. While it is significantly harder to derive the formula using this method (and isn&#039;t expected to be known in the scope of PHYS 2212), this method is still valid. This example is meant to show that in physics, there can be multiple avenues by which to solve the same exact problem, some easier than others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This derivation will account for the properties of the disk. For example, the derivation will show that the x and y-components of the Electrical field will go to 0, due to the symmetry of the charged disk. The direction of the electrical field will depend on the charge of the disk. The derivation of the magnitude of the Electrical field of a disk is shown below using this new method. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vrits2ndDerivation.jpeg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writers of the textbook Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition, have some great examples of VPython [http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/scripts/15_E_disk.py code] that show, in computational form, the electric field of a uniformly charged disk. To see the code in action, take a look at [https://trinket.io/glowscript/3088e75439 this] or copy the code into your VIDLE shell. Enjoy!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also took a look at [https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/legacy/capacitor-lab this] java applet for a lab simulation of a capacitor&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
In what circumstance would you not use the approximate formula for calculating the electric field and have to use another formula?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_4.png|300px|thumb|Figure 2: Easy problem #1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This question is important, as this situation can come up a lot when solving physics problem. Remember that in the special case &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you are allowed to use the approximate formula. But if that second condition, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is not true, then you must use the exact formula (listed above). Or, if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, you also must use the exact formula, as then the observation location is relatively far from the disk. So it is important to look at your &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; value when you decide which equation to use when finding the electric field of a uniformly charged disk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_3.png|300px|thumb|Figure 3: Middling problem #2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk, with it&#039;s center on the origin, and a of radius 0.4 m is uniformly charged with charge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = -4 * 10^{-7} C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. What is the electric field of this disk at a location &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0,0,0.04&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a a pretty simple problem, as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 0 &amp;lt;&amp;lt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so you can use the approximate formula: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \ E = \frac{4 * 10^{-7}}{2\epsilon_0π*(0.4)^{2}} = 4.5 * 10^{4}   N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:circle_2.png|300px|thumb|Figure 4: Difficult problem #3 diagram]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thin plastic disk located with a center at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m is uniformly charged with an excess of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;7.46 * 10^{-6} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; electrons. Find the radius of the disk if it generates an electric field of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = 2.2 * 10^{3} N/C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at a location of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;width:800px; overflow:auto;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Solution&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;mw-collapsible-content&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we don&#039;t know the radius of the disk, we cannot be sure that using the approximation would be accurate, because we don&#039;t know if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z &amp;lt;&amp;lt; R &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. We must use the full formula, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{πR^2}[1 - \frac{z}{(R^2+z^2)^{1/2}}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We start by calculating Q, knowing that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; Q = e * -1.602 * 10^{-19} = -1.2 * 10^{-6} C &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, we find z, which is essentially the distance from the center of the disk to the observation point. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z = mag( &amp;lt;0.1, -0.5, 0&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;0.1, 0.25, 0&amp;gt; ) = 0.75 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, we use the original equation for electric field to solve for R. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 2.6 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; m. If we solve it using the approximated formula,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; E = \frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We calculate &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; R = 3.13 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which has a significant amount of error from the original formula calculation. This indicates that using the approximation in this scenario would not have been appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
Uniformly charged disks are a fundamental component to capacitors (which is two disks placed parallel to each other), which are found everywhere in physics courses as well as the real world. They are key parts of LC circuits, RC circuits, batteries, signal processing, and can even produce light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Television&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capacitors and charged plates used to play a heavy role in televisions! Charged plates were used to accelerate electrons, which were then manipulated and directed by magnetic fields to control what area of the television screen they would strike. As they hit the screen, a certain chemical would glow a specific color, generating an image. So every time you woke up early on saturday morning (before the advent of flat screen televisions), your episodes of Spongebob and Fairly OddParents was brought to you by capacitors!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Charged Disks in Chemical Engineering&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electric fields of capacitors may seem completely unrelated to chemical engineering. But actually, there are a surprising number of applications within chemical engineering. For example, much of the instrumentation used in chemical processes rely on capacitors and their ability to generate constant electric fields between two charged plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Industrial Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary careers in chemical engineering focuses on operating, maintaining, and optimizing a chemical plant or refinery. In a refinery, there are thousands of things you have to monitor throughout the plant. Every pipe and vessel holding liquid or gas is susceptible to corrosion, and any breach in containment could jeapordize thousands of lives. One of the most common causes of corrosion is ionic contaminants in water. Before a method was found to monitor and troubleshoot the ion concentrations in water, there were numerous dangerous corrosion events that put people&#039;s lives in danger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, we monitor the conductivity of water in a refinery. This is done using CAPACITORS. Essentially, capacitors are used to monitor the changing electric field and dielectric properties of the water running through it. This data is then analyzed to find the amount of ionic contaminant in the water, allowing the chemical engineer to prevent corrosion at the source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The first capacitor was invented in 1746. It was called the Leyden Jar, and it was essentially a glass jar wrapped in aluminum on both sides. They were used initially to store charge, almost as a battery. With the advent of radio technologies, capacitors played a key role in producing and receiving radio signals. Thus, they were heavily improved due to the demand from the radio industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:dielectric_2.png|400px|center|thumb|Figure 5: a capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As technology progressed, capacitors were developed that were smaller and more compact, allowing broad uses and applications. These ranged from diverse circuits to incredibly powerful transmitters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Capacitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charged Ring]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.webassign.net/ebooks/mi4/toc.html? Matter and Interactions 3rd Edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5UyXkFCg5s Video: Electric Field Due to a Charged Disk, Infinite Sheet of Charge, Parallel Plates - Physics Problems]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.udel.edu/~watson/phys208/exercises/kevan/efield1.html Solved problems for the electric field of a ring, disk, and plane]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/category/physics PhET Simulations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/demonline/virtual/index-e.html VPython Physics Programs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor Further Online Reading]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Note: all images were created by author&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:What category did you place this in?]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46782</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46782"/>
		<updated>2024-12-04T00:20:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Further reading */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water  # done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many interesting industrial applications of heat of combustion within the real world. For example, let&#039;s look at Energy Production. Within various power plants, it is necessary to calculate/know the calorific value of different fuels, whether coal or natural gas. Knowing this enables us to optimize the various aspects of the combustion process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A large area of the field of computing is computational science, which is applying computer science and mathematics to better understand and model physical systems. With many recent breakthroughs in machine learning algorithms and our ability to use data driven-approaches to solve real world problems, we can train models on physical data to better understand our world around us. Using a combination of known physical properties and novel computing techniques, we can better understand the world around us and make interesting breakthroughs. A great example of the intersection of physics and computing is the 2024 Physics Nobel Prize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Heat of Combustion is a field with a very interesting and long history. Early scientists like Robert Boyle and Joseph Priestley have made interesting breakthroughs into understanding how oxygen is involved within combustion, which as we learned is an essential source within combustion reactions. Priestley discovered oxygen in the 1770s which was a very large initial step made towards our eventual much more complete understanding of combustion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion 17.14: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion 17.14: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46781</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46781"/>
		<updated>2024-12-04T00:20:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water  # done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many interesting industrial applications of heat of combustion within the real world. For example, let&#039;s look at Energy Production. Within various power plants, it is necessary to calculate/know the calorific value of different fuels, whether coal or natural gas. Knowing this enables us to optimize the various aspects of the combustion process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A large area of the field of computing is computational science, which is applying computer science and mathematics to better understand and model physical systems. With many recent breakthroughs in machine learning algorithms and our ability to use data driven-approaches to solve real world problems, we can train models on physical data to better understand our world around us. Using a combination of known physical properties and novel computing techniques, we can better understand the world around us and make interesting breakthroughs. A great example of the intersection of physics and computing is the 2024 Physics Nobel Prize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Heat of Combustion is a field with a very interesting and long history. Early scientists like Robert Boyle and Joseph Priestley have made interesting breakthroughs into understanding how oxygen is involved within combustion, which as we learned is an essential source within combustion reactions. Priestley discovered oxygen in the 1770s which was a very large initial step made towards our eventual much more complete understanding of combustion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion 17.14: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46780</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46780"/>
		<updated>2024-12-04T00:20:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water  # done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many interesting industrial applications of heat of combustion within the real world. For example, let&#039;s look at Energy Production. Within various power plants, it is necessary to calculate/know the calorific value of different fuels, whether coal or natural gas. Knowing this enables us to optimize the various aspects of the combustion process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A large area of the field of computing is computational science, which is applying computer science and mathematics to better understand and model physical systems. With many recent breakthroughs in machine learning algorithms and our ability to use data driven-approaches to solve real world problems, we can train models on physical data to better understand our world around us. Using a combination of known physical properties and novel computing techniques, we can better understand the world around us and make interesting breakthroughs. A great example of the intersection of physics and computing is the 2024 Physics Nobel Prize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Heat of Combustion is a field with a very interesting and long history. Early scientists like Robert Boyle and Joseph Priestley have made interesting breakthroughs into understanding how oxygen is involved within combustion, which as we learned is an essential source within combustion reactions. Priestley discovered oxygen in the 1770s which was a very large initial step made towards our eventual much more complete understanding of combustion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion / 17.14: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46779</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46779"/>
		<updated>2024-12-04T00:19:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water  # done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many interesting industrial applications of heat of combustion within the real world. For example, let&#039;s look at Energy Production. Within various power plants, it is necessary to calculate/know the calorific value of different fuels, whether coal or natural gas. Knowing this enables us to optimize the various aspects of the combustion process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A large area of the field of computing is computational science, which is applying computer science and mathematics to better understand and model physical systems. With many recent breakthroughs in machine learning algorithms and our ability to use data driven-approaches to solve real world problems, we can train models on physical data to better understand our world around us. Using a combination of known physical properties and novel computing techniques, we can better understand the world around us and make interesting breakthroughs. A great example of the intersection of physics and computing is the 2024 Physics Nobel Prize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Heat of Combustion is a field with a very interesting and long history. Early scientists like Robert Boyle and Joseph Priestley have made interesting breakthroughs into understanding how oxygen is involved within combustion, which as we learned is an essential source within combustion reactions. Priestley discovered oxygen in the 1770s which was a very large initial step made towards our eventual much more complete understanding of combustion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46778</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46778"/>
		<updated>2024-12-04T00:18:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Further reading */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water  # done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many interesting industrial applications of heat of combustion within the real world. For example, let&#039;s look at Energy Production. Within various power plants, it is necessary to calculate/know the calorific value of different fuels, whether coal or natural gas. Knowing this enables us to optimize the various aspects of the combustion process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A large area of the field of computing is computational science, which is applying computer science and mathematics to better understand and model physical systems. With many recent breakthroughs in machine learning algorithms and our ability to use data driven-approaches to solve real world problems, we can train models on physical data to better understand our world around us. Using a combination of known physical properties and novel computing techniques, we can better understand the world around us and make interesting breakthroughs. A great example of the intersection of physics and computing is the 2024 Physics Nobel Prize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Heat of Combustion is a field with a very interesting and long history. Early scientists like Robert Boyle and Joseph Priestley have made interesting breakthroughs into understanding how oxygen is involved within combustion, which as we learned is an essential source within combustion reactions. Priestley discovered oxygen in the 1770s which was a very large initial step made towards our eventual much more complete understanding of combustion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46777</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46777"/>
		<updated>2024-12-04T00:16:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* History */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water  # done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many interesting industrial applications of heat of combustion within the real world. For example, let&#039;s look at Energy Production. Within various power plants, it is necessary to calculate/know the calorific value of different fuels, whether coal or natural gas. Knowing this enables us to optimize the various aspects of the combustion process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A large area of the field of computing is computational science, which is applying computer science and mathematics to better understand and model physical systems. With many recent breakthroughs in machine learning algorithms and our ability to use data driven-approaches to solve real world problems, we can train models on physical data to better understand our world around us. Using a combination of known physical properties and novel computing techniques, we can better understand the world around us and make interesting breakthroughs. A great example of the intersection of physics and computing is the 2024 Physics Nobel Prize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Heat of Combustion is a field with a very interesting and long history. Early scientists like Robert Boyle and Joseph Priestley have made interesting breakthroughs into understanding how oxygen is involved within combustion, which as we learned is an essential source within combustion reactions. Priestley discovered oxygen in the 1770s which was a very large initial step made towards our eventual much more complete understanding of combustion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46776</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46776"/>
		<updated>2024-12-04T00:12:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Connectedness */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water  # done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many interesting industrial applications of heat of combustion within the real world. For example, let&#039;s look at Energy Production. Within various power plants, it is necessary to calculate/know the calorific value of different fuels, whether coal or natural gas. Knowing this enables us to optimize the various aspects of the combustion process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A large area of the field of computing is computational science, which is applying computer science and mathematics to better understand and model physical systems. With many recent breakthroughs in machine learning algorithms and our ability to use data driven-approaches to solve real world problems, we can train models on physical data to better understand our world around us. Using a combination of known physical properties and novel computing techniques, we can better understand the world around us and make interesting breakthroughs. A great example of the intersection of physics and computing is the 2024 Physics Nobel Prize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46775</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46775"/>
		<updated>2024-12-04T00:11:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Connectedness */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water  # done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many interesting industrial applications of heat of combustion within the real world. For example, let&#039;s look at Energy Production. Within various power plants, it is necessary to calculate/know the calorific value of different fuels, whether coal or natural gas. Knowing this enables us to optimize the various aspects of the combustion process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A large area of the field of computing is computational science, which is applying computer science and mathematics to better understand and model physical systems. With many recent breakthroughs in machine learning algorithms and our ability to use data driven-approaches to solve real world problems, we can train models on physical data to better understand our world around us. Using a combination of known physical properties and novel computing techniques, we can better understand the world around us and make interesting breakthroughs. A great example of the intersection of physics and computing is the 2024 Physics Nobel Prize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46774</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46774"/>
		<updated>2024-12-04T00:00:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water  # done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46773</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46773"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T23:59:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water  # done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46772</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46772"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T23:59:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water  # done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46771</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46771"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T23:59:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water  # done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46770</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46770"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T23:58:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water  # done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46769</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46769"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T23:57:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water  # done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46747</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46747"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T22:33:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water  # done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46745</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46745"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T22:32:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water #done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    #calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46744</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46744"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T22:32:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water #done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    #calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46743</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46743"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T22:32:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Insert Computational Model Here&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
csd&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water #done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    #calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46742</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46742"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T22:31:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Insert Computational Model Here&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
```&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water #done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    #calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)```&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46741</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46741"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T22:31:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Insert Computational Model Here&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
```def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water #done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    #calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)```&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46740</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46740"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T22:31:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Insert Computational Model Here&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water #done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    #calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46739</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46739"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T22:30:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Insert Computational Model Here&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water #done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    #calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46738</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46738"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T22:30:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: /* Computational Model */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Insert Computational Model Here&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
def calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    # first we need to calculate the moles of Ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    moles_ethanol = mass_ethanol / molar_mass_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # next we will calculate the energy transferred to the water&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water = m_water * C_water * delta_T_water #done in joules&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    # convert resulting energy transfer from J to kJ&lt;br /&gt;
    delta_Q_water_kJ = delta_Q_water / 1000 &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    #calculating the heat of combustion of ethanol (kJ/mol)&lt;br /&gt;
    heat_of_combustion = delta_Q_water_kJ / moles_ethanol&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    return heat_of_combustion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# initial conditions from the simple example&lt;br /&gt;
mass_ethanol = 1.55  # grams&lt;br /&gt;
molar_mass_ethanol = 46.1  # g/mol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
m_water = 200  # grams (water)&lt;br /&gt;
C_water = 4.18  # J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)&lt;br /&gt;
delta_T_water = 55  # °C (temperature increase of water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
heat_of_combustion = calculate_heat_of_combustion(mass_ethanol, molar_mass_ethanol, m_water, C_water, delta_T_water)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46734</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46734"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T22:14:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Insert Computational Model Here&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46733</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46733"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T22:14:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Insert Computational Model Here&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46732</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46732"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T22:03:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Insert Computational Model Here&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46731</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46731"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T22:02:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Insert Computational Model Here&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46730</id>
		<title>Calorific Value(Heat of combustion)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.physicsbook.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Calorific_Value(Heat_of_combustion)&amp;diff=46730"/>
		<updated>2024-12-03T22:01:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pnarala3: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Claimed by Pranav Narala (Fall 2024).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main Idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The Calorific Value of a sample, also known as its Heat of Combustion, is defined as the amount of heat released during the complete combustion of the sample. In this chemical reaction, a molecule usually consisting of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen, is usually oxidized by diatomic oxygen to form carbon dioxide and other products. This process is exothermic, and thus releases heat when more stable bonds are formed. The bonds in the reactant are unreactive with oxygen under normal conditions, so the necessary activation energy must be applied.  Once the activation energy is provided, the reaction occurs very quickly and violently due to the relative stabilities of the products&#039; bonds. Since combustion is exothermic, one reaction on the molecular level provides the energy necessary to activate another, meaning combustions are often chain reactions and can sustain themselves as long as oxygen is present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Caloric Value itself measures the thermal energy released per unit of mass or moles depending on the size of the reaction. Hence, its unit is J/kg, but can be measured in calories per mass as well, as seen in food. This is the SI unit for unit and is defined as being the energy necessary to heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. Since this is a small amount of energy, the calorie is measured in kCal, or Calories with a capital c, just as energy is often represented in kJ. The heat of combustion can be measured either by the higher heat value (HHV) which analyzes simply the energy released by the reaction, and the lower heat value, which incorporates the energy absorbed by water to change from liquid phase to gas phase. If the reaction does not form water, there is no difference between the two values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HHV is typically measured through experiments using a bomb calorimeter, where the sample is supplied with excess oxygen.  This device measures the temperature change. From this, the Heat of Combustion can be computed using the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LHV is the HHV minus the energy the water absorbed to transition states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mathematical Model===&lt;br /&gt;
A typical combustion reaction looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_x\text{H}_y\text{N}_z\text{O}_n + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow x\text{CO}_2 + \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} + \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 \quad Q =  \boldsymbol{\Omega} \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{C}_x =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Carbon&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{H}_y =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{N}_z =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Nitrogen&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \text{O}_n =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; atoms of Oxygen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ x\text{CO}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Carbon Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{y}{2}\text{H}_2\text{O} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{y}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Water&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \frac{z}{2}\text{N}_2 =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{z}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; moles of Nitrogen gas&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ Q =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\bullet \ \boldsymbol{\Omega} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; a constant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let us look at this combustion reaction as an example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH} + \text{O}_2 \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2 + 2\text{H}_{2}\text{O} \quad Q = 890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we see the Heat of Combustion of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{CH}_{3}\text{OH}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Methanol, is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;890 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also always important to keep the [[Thermal Energy| Thermal Energy Equation]] in mind when thinking of these things, since it does relate Heat to a Temperature change:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mc \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hess&#039;s law can be used to determine the change in enthalpy of a given chemical reaction. By finding the difference between the sums of the bond enthalpies of the products by the sum of the bond enthalpies of the reactants, one can determine how much energy is released or absorbed based on the reaction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Computational Model===&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;Insert Computational Model Here&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Simple===&lt;br /&gt;
A 1.55 gram sample of Ethanol is burned in a bomb calorimeter:&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{5}\text{OH} + 3\text{O}_2 \longrightarrow 2\text{CO}_2 + 3\text{H}_{2}\text{O}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) If this combustion caused a Temperature increase of 55&amp;amp;deg;C in a 200 gram sample of water, what is the Molar Heat of Combustion of the Ethanol? Water has a Specific Heat Capacity of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Ethanol has a molar mass of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using dimensional analysis, we can find the number of moles of Ethanol in the 1.55 gram sample. Letting &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the mass of the sample in grams, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Mm&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the molar mass of Ethanol in grams per mole, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the number of moles of Ethanol, we see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M = \frac{m}{1} \times \frac{1}{Mm} = \frac{1.55g}{1} \times \frac{1 \ mol}{46.1g} = 0.0336 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, from the Thermal Energy equation, we can calculate the Heat transferred to the water:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q = mC \Delta T&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The following are known values:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = 200g&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C = 4.18 \ \frac{J}{g \cdot &amp;amp;deg;C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T = 55&amp;amp;deg;C&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can plug these values into &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039; and get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 200 \times 4.18 \times 55 = 45,980 \ J = 45.98 \ kJ&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By conservation of energy, we can reason that the Heat gained by the water sample is equal to the Heat lost by the Ethanol in the process of combustion. Hence, we make the following assumption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = Q_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q_{Ethanol} =&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the Heat of Combustion of this specific Ethanol sample&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can use this to find the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\boldsymbol{\Omega} = \frac{Q_{Ethanol}}{M} = \frac{\Delta Q_{water}}{M} = \frac{45.98 \ kJ}{0.0336 \ mol} = 1,368.4 \ \frac{kJ}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Middling===&lt;br /&gt;
A bowl has a mass of 100 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) while there is Ethanol in it. It is known from a previous measurement that the bowl had a mass of 50 grams (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{bowl}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A cup of water with mass 10 grams is heated from 20&amp;amp;deg;C to 50&amp;amp;deg;C by burning some of the sample of Ethanol. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&#039;&#039;&#039;a) Using these two statements, determine how much Ethanol must have combusted.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let us call the mass of Ethanol combusted &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. From statement one, we can figure out the total mass of the Ethanol sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m = m_{bowl} + m_{Ethanol_{t}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{t}} = m - m_{bowl} = 100 - 50 = 50 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, we want to figure out how much Heat must have been produced to warm the cup of water as much as was stated. We can do this with the Thermal Energy Equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = m_{water}C_{water} \Delta T_{water}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We know enough of the quantities in the equation to solve for the change in Thermal Energy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta Q_{water} = 10 \times 4.18 \times (50 - 20) = 1254 \ J&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(1)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Referring back to the Simple example, we know the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Omega = 1,368.4 \ \frac{J}{mol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We can find the number of moles of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) required to create the amount of Heat in &#039;&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&#039;, using the Molar Heat of Combustion of Ethanol:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_{Ethanol} =  \Delta Q_{water} \frac{1}{\Omega_{Ethanol}} = 1254 \ \left(\frac{J}{1 }\right) \times \frac{1}{1,368.4} \ \left(\frac{mol}{J}\right) = 0.916 \ mol&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Using the molar mass of Ethanol &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left(Mm_{Ethanol} = 46.1 \ \frac{g}{mol}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can find the number of grams of Ethanol (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{ethanol_{c}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) used to cause the necessary combustion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m_{Ethanol_{c}} = M_{Ethanol} \times Mm_{Ethanol} = 0.916 \ \left(\frac{mol}{1}\right) \times 46.1 \ \left(\frac{g}{mol}\right) = 42.23&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We have found that 42.23 grams of the 50 gram Ethanol sample was combusted to Heat the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Difficult===&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
What is the energy released when 1 kg of propane (C3H8) reacts with excess oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water? Bond enthalpies : C-H is 412 kJ/mol. C-C is 348 kJ mol, O=O is 498 kj/mol, H-O is 460 and C=O is 732&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, the chemical equation must be identified and balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
2C3H8 + 5O2 yields 3CO2 + 4H2O&lt;br /&gt;
Then, the bond enthalpies of the reactants must be summed.&lt;br /&gt;
 (2 C-C x 348 + 8 C-H x 412) x 2 = 7984.&lt;br /&gt;
 1 O=O x 495 x 5 = 2475.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 10459 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 For the reactants.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 C=O x 732 x 3 = 2988 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 2 H-O x 460 x 4 = 3680.&lt;br /&gt;
 Their sum is 8072 kj mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 Subtracting according to Hess&#039;s law shows an enthalpy of -2,387 kj/mol.&lt;br /&gt;
 We have a mass of propane which must be converted to mols. Since the molar mass of propane is 44.1 g/ mol, there are 22.67 mols of propane.&lt;br /&gt;
 This reacts completely with excess oxygen.&lt;br /&gt;
 22.67 mols x -2,387 kj/mol = -54,126.98 kJ energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connectedness==&lt;br /&gt;
:Determining the heat of combustion of a fuel is essential when it is used an Energy source. Rockets, for example, convert chemical energy into gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. Thus, knowing the necessary fuel to accomplish an escape speed without using too much space is critical. Chemical reactions are key as an energy source whether they provide electrical energy or thermal energy. My interest in health also contributes to enthalpy formation, specifically with the macromolecules our body prioritize to store energy. The bonds in carbohydrates do are more readily reactive and thus have a lower heat of formation than carbohydrates. Despite their composition have similar molecules, the bonding of each allows for a larger heat of formation when fats are consumed than when carbohydrates are, leading them to be stored as they are a better source of energy for less space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1840, Russian chemist Germain Hess proposed that the summation of enthalpy between the initial reactants of a multi-step reaction and the final products was the same no matter the pathways taken. He proposed that the change in enthalpy was a state function, and thus did not depend on the pathway taken so long as the overall reactants and products are the same. He experimented on the hydrates of sulfuric acids and determined that the heat released was the same no matter the path taken. He was a primarily experimental chemist and was concerned with how the affinity of molecules impacts its release in thermal energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12: Heat of Combustion 2]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kinds of Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Energy Principle]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservation of Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[System &amp;amp; Surroundings]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermal Energy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Specific Heat]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Temperature]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_combustion Wikipedia: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/17%3A_Thermochemistry/17.14%3A_Heat_of_Combustion CK-12: Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ck12.org/chemistry/heat-of-combustion/lesson/Heat-of-Combustion-CHEM/ CK-12:Heat of Combustion]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://opentextbc.ca/introductorychemistry/chapter/the-mole-in-chemical-reactions-2/ The Mole in Chemical Reactions]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germain_Henri_Hess]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pnarala3</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>